Flour Hub

Pulses in Bakery

Flour Hub

Enhance your nutrition and sustainability messaging with clean label ingredients

Baked goods are a staple component of diets around the world. A study of nutrient intakes from diets as reported by Canadian adults found that as the percentage of total daily protein intake from plant sources increased, the primary protein source was from cereal-based food sources (breads, rolls, crackers, and grains) and the intake of other plant protein sources such as legumes was low (Fabek et al., 2021). It is well known that plant protein sources are typically deficient in one or more of the indispensable amino acids. Relying on one type of plant protein introduces risk for groups consuming higher proportions of their daily total protein intake from plant sources.

Reformulating cereal foods with pulse flours is an immense opportunity to improve the protein quality of baked products and address potential dietary intake concerns because of their significantly higher protein contents and the complementary nature of their amino acid profiles.

The addition of pulse ingredients to cereal foods can also complement the nutritional profile of products through combined increases in fibre, folate, iron, potassium, and other micronutrients (Marinangeli, 2020). A study examining the effect of reformulated traditional pan bread with 15% whole yellow pea flour not only reported significant improvements in the nutritional quality of the product but also noted a 4% decrease in the CO2 equivalent per kg of food (Chaudhary et al., 2018).

Working with pulse flour in baked products

Increasing the inclusion level of pulse flour typically results in proportional increases in nutritional quality. However, this may be at the expense of dough-handling properties and machinability. The higher protein and fibre present in pulse flours may reduce free water available in the system or physically interfere with dough handling. The reduced dough hydration and development may result in baked goods with a more densely packed microstructure exhibited as a reduction in product volume accompanied by increased product firmness.

However, many studies have identified substitution rates in which the nutrition profile is successfully enhanced with minimal effects on handling, product quality, and sensory properties. Specific inclusion rates based on the category of baked goods are highlighted in the sections below.

Applications

Bread, Biscuits, Buns & Rolls, Cake, Cookies & Wafers, Flatbreads, Pitas & Tortillas, Sourdough, Gluten-free Bread, Gluten-free Biscuits, Gluten-free Cookies, Gluten-free Flatbreads & Tortillas, Gluten-free Muffins, Gluten-free Crackers

Functions

Increase protein content, increase protein quality, increase carbohydrate quality, increase slowly digestible starch, increase total dietary fibre, increase vitamins and minerals, low glycemic index

Marketing Appeal

Clean label, improved nutrition, better-for-you indulgence, sustainability

Application: Bread

Pulse flours have successfully substituted up to 30% of wheat flour in the formulation of Yeast-leavened breads. Typical formulations comprise of simple flour, yeast and salt but many other additional ingredients from sugars and fats to dough conditioners and improvers have also been evaluated. Hydration rates for pulse-containing bread doughs are variable depending on the formulation, pulse type, flour composition and particle size. A breakdown of bread formulations and hydration levels according to pulse type has been provided in the table below.

Adding pulse flours to pan breads successfully improves the nutritional profile relative to control formulations through increases in total protein and complex carbohydrates such as fibre, resistant starch and slowly digestible starch. For instance, 20% pea flour inclusion in a wheat-based bread increased protein by up to 25% and fibre by up to 90% (Figure 1, 2, Kotsiou et al., 2021). A study evaluating 16% inclusion of dehulled green lentil flour reduced the glycemic index in vivo by 13%, changing the GI category of the focaccia bread from "medium" to "low" (Figure 3, Fujiwara et al., 2017).


Example Bread Formulations with Pulse Flours

Pulse Type Pulse Inclusion (%flour) Water Addition (%) Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) Reference
Pulse Type
germinated, whole bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
53.7
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
3g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Atudori et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
germinated, whole bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
53
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
3g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Atudori et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
germinated, whole bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
52.7
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
3g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
3g yeast, 1.5g salt
Pulse Type
germinated, whole bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
52
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
3g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
3g yeast, 1.5g salt
Pulse Type
raw, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
52
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
cooked, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
68
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
fermented, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
74
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
roasted, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
62
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
raw, whole green pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
40
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
cooked, whole green pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
74
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
fermented, whole green pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
80
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
roasted, whole green pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
62
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
raw, whole lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
50
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
cooked, whole lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
70
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
fermented, whole lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
76
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
roasted, whole lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
63
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt
Reference
Baik and Han (2012)
Pulse Type
raw, chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
61
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
61.1
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
61.6
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, red lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
58.7
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, red lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
58.8
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, red lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
57.4
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, faba bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
63.6
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, faba bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
64.7
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, faba bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
66.2
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
60.1
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
60.2
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, bean
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
60.1
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast
Reference
Bojnanska et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
7.2
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g yeast, 2g salt
Reference
Dabija et al. (2017)
Pulse Type
raw, yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
57.7
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g yeast, 2g salt
Reference
Dabija et al. (2017)
Pulse Type
raw, yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
58.3
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g yeast, 2g salt
Reference
Dabija et al. (2017)
Pulse Type
raw, yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
58.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g yeast, 2g salt
Reference
Dabija et al. (2017)
Pulse Type
raw, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
ns
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
4g gluten, 4g yeast, 4g sugar, 4g shortening, 2g salt, 2g skim milk powder, 2g dough conditioner
Reference
Fahmi et al. (2019)
Pulse Type
steam roasted, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
ns
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
4g gluten, 4g yeast, 4g sugar, 4g shortening, 2g salt, 2g skim milk powder, 2g dough conditioner
Reference
Fahmi et al. (2019)
Pulse Type
raw, dehulled green lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
16
Water Addition (%)
ns
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
olive oil, yeast, garlic powder, salt, pepper, herb mix
Reference
Fujiwara et al. (2017)
Pulse Type
raw, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
60.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g salt, 1g yeast
Reference
Kotsiou et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
61
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g salt, 1g yeast
Reference
Kotsiou et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
61.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g salt, 1g yeast
Reference
Kotsiou et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
Water Addition (%)
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g salt, 1g yeast
Reference
Kotsiou et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
62.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g salt, 1g yeast
Reference
Kotsiou et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
59.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g salt, 1.5g yeast, 1g dough improver, 1g unsalted butter
Reference
Millar er al. (2019)
Pulse Type
germinated, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
58
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g salt, 1.5g yeast, 1g dough improver, 1g unsalted butter
Reference
Millar er al. (2019)
Pulse Type
dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
63
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
2g salt, 1.5g yeast, 1g dough improver, 1g unsalted butter
Reference
Millar er al. (2019)
Pulse Type
raw, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
59.9
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
3g yeast, 1.2g salt, 1g sugar
Reference
Mohammed et al. (2014)
Pulse Type
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
61
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
3g yeast, 1.2g salt, 1g sugar
Reference
Mohammed et al. (2014)
Pulse Type
raw, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
62.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
3g yeast, 1.2g salt, 1g sugar
Reference
Mohammed et al. (2014)
Pulse Type
raw, whole white lupin
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
67.6
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
0-5g gluten, 3.6g yeast, 1g salt, 1g sugar, 1g vegetable fat
Reference
Pleming et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole white lupin
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
72.4
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
0-5g gluten, 3.6g yeast, 1g salt, 1g sugar, 1g vegetable fat
Reference
Pleming et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole white lupin
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
10
Water Addition (%)
60
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
4.5g salt, 3g yeast
Reference
Plustea et al. (2022)
Pulse Type
raw, whole white lupin
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
64.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
4.5g salt, 3g yeast
Reference
Plustea et al. (2022)
Pulse Type
raw, whole white lupin
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
30
Water Addition (%)
62.2
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
4.5g salt, 3g yeast
Reference
Plustea et al. (2022)
Pulse Type
raw, whole yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
Ns
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6.5g yeast, 2g gluten, 1.5g salt, 1g canola oil, 1g dough conditioner, 0.5g sugar
Reference
Young et al. (2020)
Pulse Type
dry roasted, whole yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
Ns
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6.5g yeast, 2g gluten, 1.5g salt, 1g canola oil, 1g dough conditioner, 0.5g sugar
Reference
Young et al. (2020)
Pulse Type
steam roasted, whole yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
20
Water Addition (%)
ns
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6.5g yeast, 2g gluten, 1.5g salt, 1g canola oil, 1g dough conditioner, 0.5g sugar
Reference
Young et al. (2020)
Pulse Type
raw, whole yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
75
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
72.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole yellow pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
25
Water Addition (%)
70
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole green pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
75
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole green pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
72.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole green pea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
25
Water Addition (%)
70
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole red lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
75
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole red lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
73.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole red lentil
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
25
Water Addition (%)
72
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
5
Water Addition (%)
75
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
15
Water Addition (%)
72.5
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)
Pulse Type
raw, whole chickpea
Pulse Inclusion (%flour)
25
Water Addition (%)
68
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour)
6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour
Reference
Zhang et al. (2021)

Ns = not specified

Raw Pulse Flours

Where raw pulse flours are being used, substitution rates of 5-10% have been reported to produce breads with comparable quality and minimal-to-no differences in dough handling and final bread sensory and textural quality compared to 100% wheat-based formulations (Autdorei et al., 2021; Bojnanska et al., 2021; Dabija et al., 2017; Kotsiou et al., 2021; Mohammed et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2021). At higher inclusion levels (≥15%), studies note a reduction in dough handling properties, loaf volume and the detection of pulse-related flavours and aromas.

Thermally Treated Pulse Flours

It is worth noting that much of the undesirable effects on final product quality have been alleviated through the use of thermally treated pulse flours; a common commercial technique used for its de-flavouring ability. For example, Millar et al. (2019) reported the dough handling properties of 30% dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea flour to be superior to those of raw and germinated flours resulting in breads with loaf volumes and densities comparable to the 100% wheat control. A similar study found that heat treatment minimized the negative sensory effects typically imparted by yellow pea on the colour, aroma and flavour of breads with minimal differences in end-product quality even when different roasting process conditions were applied (heating equipment, temperature, and steam) (Young et al., 2020). Other techniques used to improve the overall quality of pulse-containing breads include adjustments to the baking process and the addition of gluten and/or dough conditioners and improvers.

Protein Content Relative to 100% Wheat Control

Figure 1: % Increase in protein content in breads formulated with yellow pea flour (Kotsiou et al., 2021)

Fibre Content Relative to 100% Wheat Control

Figure 2: % Increase in fibre content in breads formulated with yellow pea flour (Kotsiou et al., 2021)

Glycemic Index (GI) of Focaccia Bread

  • Control
  • 16% Dehulled, Green Lentil
Glycemic index foccacia

Figure 3: Change in Glycemix Index after reformulation with lentil flour. Data adapted from Fujiwara et al., 2017

Application: Biscuits

Biscuits reformulated with pulse flours at substitution rates up to 20% have resulted in products with 22% higher protein and 950% higher fibre levels relative to control formulations (Figure 4, 5).

Example Formulation: Chickpea/Faba Bean Flour (3 - 12%)

Adapted from Rababeh et al., 2016

Water Sugar Shortening Sodium Bicarbonate Salt Lecithin
48 grams 34 grams 28 grams 1.12 grams 0.93 grams 0.5 grams
Water Sugar Shortening Sodium Bicarbonate Salt Lecithin
48 grams 34 grams 28 grams 1.12 grams 0.93 grams 0.5 grams

Example Formulation: Pea Flour (5 - 20%)

Adapted from Qayyum et al., 2017

Water Sugar Shortening Egg Milk Vanilla Extract
59 - 61 grams 40 grams 55 grams 10 grams 4 mL  
Water Sugar Shortening Egg Milk Vanilla Extract
59 - 61 grams 40 grams 55 grams 10 grams 4 mL  

Protein Content Relative to Control

Figure 4: % Increase in protein content in biscuits formulated with whole chickpea and faba bean flours (Rababah et al., 2006)

Fibre Content Relative to Control

Figure 5: % Increase in fibre content in biscuits formulated with whole pea flour, Data from Qayyum et al., 2017

Application: Breads and Rolls

Research conducted by Kohajdove et al. (2013) reformulated baked rolls using 10-30% lentil and small white bean flour. The addition of pulse flour increased farinograph water absorption level and dough development time but resulted in decreased dough stability. Physical parameters were negatively affected, including decreases in volume, specific volume, and cambering. The highest acceptability and physical parameters values were achieved using a 10% pulse blend. Alternatively, Muldabekove et al. (2022) evaluated the use of dry sugar beet powder, chickpea and mung bean flour to replace refined sugar in buns. Successful formulations were obtained using 10% chickpea, 5% mung bean and 9% dry sugar beet powder, where the addition of pulse flours resulted in an overall 9-30% reduction in overall bun processing time due to its effect on dough preparation and baking.

Example Bun Formulation With Pulse Flours

Wheat Flour, 10% Chickpea Flour, 5% Mung Bean Flour

Adapted from Muldabekove et al. (2022)

Flour Milk Egg Butter Dry Sugar Beet Powder Yeast
100 grams 46 mL 15 grams 15 grams 9.23 grams 1.85 grams
Flour Milk Egg Butter Dry Sugar Beet Powder Yeast
100 grams 46 mL 15 grams 15 grams 9.23 grams 1.85 grams

Application: Cakes

The addition of pulse flours to sponge and layer cake formulations can improve nutritional and structural properties, with limited detectable differences in sensory characteristics, depending on pulse type and batter mixing method.

Gomez et al. (2012) successfully substituted up to 50% of wheat flour in sponge cake and 25% in layer cake with yellow pea flour while maintaining similar specific volume and firmness to the control and minimal differences in sensory quality (Figure 6, 7 below). Layer cakes were found to be more sensitive to detectable differences in sensory characteristics as a result of pea flour inclusion. Gallego et al. (2022) substituted 50% of wheat with chickpea flour in layer cake formulations and was able to obtain similar specific volume and hardness to the control with only minor decreases in the overall acceptability as determined by a 100-person volunteer consumer panel.

In a specific investigation on off-odour development in cakes, Krause et al. (2022) replaced 25% wheat flour in sponge cake formulations with chickpea, green lentil, lupin, green pea and yellow pea flours. The reformulated cakes produced desirable nutritional and structural properties, where odour profiles of cakes were influenced by pulse type and the batter mixing stage; the latter directly related to catalyzing lipid oxidation reactions associated with beany and bitter notes. The same research group later identified batter mixing to be a significant control step in the odour profile of resulting cakes. Interestingly, the addition of most pulse flours to sponge cakes resulted in an increased volume that was attributed to the high protein content and accompanying emulsifying properties which are important in cake batter structure development.

Layer Cake With Chickpea Flour

Adapted from Gallego et al. 2022

Flour (50% Chickpea Flour) Sugar Whole Milk Liquid Pasteurized Egg Sunflower Oil Baking Powder
350 grams 315 grams 210 grams 105 grams 205 grams 10.5 grams
Flour (50% Chickpea Flour) Sugar Whole Milk Liquid Pasteurized Egg Sunflower Oil Baking Powder
350 grams 315 grams 210 grams 105 grams 205 grams 10.5 grams

Layer Cake With Pea Flour

Adapted from Gomez et al. 2012

Flour (25-50% Pea Flour) Sugar Milk Liquid Pasteurized Egg Sunflower Oil Baking Powder
350 grams 315 grams 210 grams 175 grams 105 grams 10.5 grams
Flour (25-50% Pea Flour) Sugar Milk Liquid Pasteurized Egg Sunflower Oil Baking Powder
350 grams 315 grams 210 grams 175 grams 105 grams 10.5 grams

Sponge Cake With Pea Flour

Adapted from Gomez et al. 2012

Flour (25-50% Pea Flour) Sugar Liquid Pasteurized Egg Water Whipping Aid Agent Powdered Milk
245 grams 240.5 grams 344 grams 55 grams 14 grams 25 grams
Flour (25-50% Pea Flour) Sugar Liquid Pasteurized Egg Water Whipping Aid Agent Powdered Milk
245 grams 240.5 grams 344 grams 55 grams 14 grams 25 grams

Sponge Cake With Lentil, Lupin, Chickpea or Pea Flour

Adapted from Krause et al. 2022

Flour (25% Pulse Flour) Sucrose Eggs Sunflower Oil
630 grams 25% 45% 5%
Flour (25% Pulse Flour) Sucrose Eggs Sunflower Oil
630 grams 25% 45% 5%

Sponge Cake Sensory Analysis

  • Control
  • 25% Starch-Rich Pea Flour
  • 25% Pea Flour
  • 50% Starch-Rich Pea Flour
  • 50% Pea Flour
Sponge cake

Figure 6: Sensory analysis of sponge cake formulated with pea ingredients (Gomez et al., 2012)

Layer Cake Sensory Analysis

  • Control
  • 25% Starch-Rich Pea Flour
  • 25% Pea Flour
Layer cake

Figure 7: Sensory analysis of layer cake formulated with pea flour ingredients. Data adapted from Gomez et al. (2012). Values with different letters are significantly different from one another p<0.05. Scales values range from 1= dislike extremely, 9= like extremely

Application: Cookies & Wafers


Pulse flours have been incorporated at up to 50% substitution rates in cookie and wafer formulations with significant improvements to the nutritional profile (Figure 8, 9). Pulse flour type, inclusion and particle size have all been reported to significantly affect quality attributes such as cookie weight, thickness, width, and hardness (Zucco et al. 2011). While the inclusion of pulse flours typically resulted in increased cookie hardness and height with a reduction in the spread, coarse pulse flours (90% of particles below 415-440 mm) were reported to have opposite effects on weight and thickness, producing softer cookies with greater spread than control formulations. (Figure 10)

Example Cookie and Wafer Formulations with Pulse Flours

Pulse Type Inclusion Rate Other Ingredients per 100g Flour Reference
Pulse Type
Dehulled green lentil
Inclusion Rate
11%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
Pastry flour, butter, salt, sugar, dehulled yellow pea flour, pea protein concentrate, vanilla, cocoa powder, baking powder
Reference
Fujiwara et al. (2017)
Pulse Type
Germinated kidney bean and chickpea blend
Inclusion Rate
50%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
50g shortening, 40g sugar, 20g skim milk powder, 20mL water 1g sodium bicarbonate, 1g salt
Reference
Sibian and Riar (2020)
Pulse Type
Whole chickpea
Inclusion Rate
25%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
50g sugar, 50g white butter, 1.4g ammonium bicarbonate
Reference
Thongram et al. (2016)
Pulse Type
Whole mung bean
Inclusion Rate
25%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
50g sugar, 50g white butter, 1.4g ammonium bicarbonate
Reference
Thongram et al. (2016)
Pulse Type
Bean
Inclusion Rate
20%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
182g water, 1g hydrogenated vegetable fat, 0.5g lecithin, 0,5% sodium bicarbonate
Reference
Tufan et al. (2019)
Pulse Type
Chickpea
Inclusion Rate
20%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
182g water, 1g hydrogenated vegetable fat, 0.5g lecithin, 0,5% sodium bicarbonate
Reference
Tufan et al. (2019)
Pulse Type
Lentil
Inclusion Rate
20%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
182g water, 1g hydrogenated vegetable fat, 0.5g lecithin, 0,5% sodium bicarbonate
Reference
Tufan et al. (2019)
Pulse Type
Dehulled green lentil
Inclusion Rate
25-100%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
58g sugar, 29g shortening, 17.8g skim milk solution, 14g water, 1.1g sodium bicarbonate, 0.9g salt
Reference
Zucco et al. (2011)
Pulse Type
Whole navy bean
Inclusion Rate
25-100%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
58g sugar, 29g shortening, 17.8g skim milk solution, 14g water, 1.1g sodium bicarbonate, 0.9g salt
Reference
Zucco et al. (2011)
Pulse Type
Whole pinto bean
Inclusion Rate
25-100%
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour
58g sugar, 29g shortening, 17.8g skim milk solution, 14g water, 1.1g sodium bicarbonate, 0.9g salt
Reference
Zucco et al. (2011)

Protein Content Relative to Control

Figure 8: % Increase in protein content in cookie/wafers formulated with pulse flours
a) Fujiwara et al., 2017; b) Tufan et al., 2019; c) Thongram et al., 2016; d) Zucco et al. 2011; e) Sibian and Riar 2020

Fibre Content Relative to Control

Figure 9: % Increase in fibre in cookie/wafers formulated with pulse flours
a) Fujiwara et al., 2017; b) Tufan et al., 2019; c) Thongram et al., 2016; d) Sibian and Riar 2020

Texture (Peak Force - N)

  • Coarse (d90: 415-440 um)
  • Fine (d90: < 50 um)
  • Control
Texture

Figure 10: Texture analysis of cookies formulated with pulse flours milled to coarse and fine granulations, adapted from Zucco et al. (2011)

Application Flat Breads, Pitas & Tortillas

Research conducted at the University of Manitoba evaluated the application of coarsely and finely ground dehulled green lentil, navy and pinto bean flours at rates of 25-100% in pita bread (Borsuk et al., 2012). Even at 100% inclusion, pulse formulations successfully formed pockets and were deemed suitable for pita processing.

At 25% inclusion, navy bean and pinto bean flours performed as well as or superior to the control based on the physical, textural, colour and sensory properties of the final product (Figure 11).

A later study evaluated the use of raw, infrared heated and roasted whole yellow pea, navy bean and faba beans flours in tortilla and pita applications (Frohlich et al., 2021). The heat treatments applied had minimal effects on end-product quality and were successfully able to reduce bitter and beany flavours commonly associated with pulses (Figure 12). This resulted in a higher purchasing intent for tortillas and pitas produced from infrared-heated pea and navy beans when evaluated by a consumer panel composed of 80 panellists.

Example Tortilla Formulation

Adapted from Frohlich et al. 2021

Ingredient Amount
Flour Blend 100 grams
Canola Oil 10 grams
Salt 1.5 grams
Baking Powder 15 grams
Dry Yeast 1 gram
Sugar 0.5 grams
Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate 0.375 grams
Monoglyceride 0.375 grams
Calcium Propionate 0.375 grams
Fumaric Acid 0.375 grams
Ingredient Amount
Flour Blend 100 grams
Canola Oil 10 grams
Salt 1.5 grams
Baking Powder 15 grams
Dry Yeast 1 gram
Sugar 0.5 grams
Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate 0.375 grams
Monoglyceride 0.375 grams
Calcium Propionate 0.375 grams
Fumaric Acid 0.375 grams

Example Pita Formulation

Adapted from Frohlich et al. 2021

Flour Blend Salt Compressed Yeast Calcium Propionate
100 grams 1 gram 1 gram 0.375 grams
Flour Blend Salt Compressed Yeast Calcium Propionate
100 grams 1 gram 1 gram 0.375 grams

Adapted from Borsuk et al. 2012

Flour Blend Salt Active Dry Yeast Gum Mix*
100 grams 1.5 grams 1.0 grams 0.4 grams
Flour Blend Salt Active Dry Yeast Gum Mix*
100 grams 1.5 grams 1.0 grams 0.4 grams

*Mixture of cellulose, guar and xanthan gum

Mean Sensory Scores for Pitas

  • Control
  • 25% Navy Bean
  • 25% Pinto Bean
  • 100% Navy Bean
Mean sensory scores pitas

Figure 11: Data adapted from Borsuk et al. (2012) as evaluated by 80 consumer panelists on a nine-point scale from 1= dislike extremely to 9 = like extremely. Means with different letter designations are statistically (p<0.05) different from one another.

Figure 12: Flavour analysis of pitas formulated with pulse flours, Data from Frohlich et al. (2021)

Application: Sourdough Bread

Pulse flours have been incorporated into sourdough bread both directly into the fermented starter culture or as an additional ingredient to the bread formulation during dough mixing. Research by Rizello et al. (2014) evaluated both methods of preparation using a 15% blend of chickpea, lentil and bean flours at equal ratios. Authors reported improvements to the overall nutritional profile of the bread including an increase in protein, crude fibre, total free amino acids and antioxidant activity relative to the wheat-based, yeast-leavened control bread (Figure 14, 15, 16). Texture, image and sensory evaluation of all sourdoughs displayed good acceptability, with the fermented wheat/pulse blend starter culture exhibiting minimal differences in quality compared to the control.

A similar study evaluating the incorporation of 30% raw and fermented, dehulled faba bean flours did not note any severe negative effects of its inclusion on the technological performance of sourdough breads other than a reduction in loaf volume (Coda et al., 2017). However, fermenting faba-wheat blends as part of the starter culture resulted in sourdough breads with significantly higher in vitro protein digestibility, protein efficiency ratio and a reduced predicted glycemic index (Figure 13). Bourre et al. (2019) identified the most acceptable flavour and quality characteristics in breads produced with a 25% inclusion of sourdough culture that had been fermented for 1hr. Interestingly, the evaluation of the fermented and subsequently frozen sourdough culture containing 25 and 50% chickpea flour found that chickpea addition significantly decreased the percentage of freezable water content in the dough (Figure 17) (Ozulku et al., 2017). This limited destruction of the gluten network and the injuring of yeast cells as a result of ice crystal formation, resulting in improved texture after freezing. The benefit of this was demonstrated after baking the frozen doughs, in which the volume of control sourdough formulations decreased by 17% after freezing, where no significant changes occurred in chickpea-containing breads (Figure 18). Further research is warranted to elucidate the effects of pulse flour inclusion on quality retention in frozen doughs.

In Vitro Protein Digestibility (IVPD), Protein Efficiency Ration (PER) and Predicted Glycemic Index (pGI) of Sourdough Breads

  • Control
  • 30% Raw Faba Bean
  • 30% Fermented Faba Bean
In vitro protein digestibility

Figure 13 In Vitro Protein Digestibility (IVPD), Protein Efficiency Ration (PER) and Predicted Glycemic Index (pGI) of Sourdough Breads

Protein Content Relative to Control

Protein sourdough

Figure 14: % Increase in protein content in sourdough formulated with chickpea, lentil and/or bean

Fibre Content Relative to Control

Fibre sourdough

Figure 15: % Increase in fibre content in sourdough formulated with raw and fermented chickpea, lentil and bean flours

Free Amino Acid Relative to Control

Free amino acid sourdough

Figure 16: % Increase in free amino acid content in sourdough formulated with chickpea, lentil and/or bean flours

Freezable Water Content of Sourdough Bread (%)

Freezable water content sourdough

Figure 17: Changes in freezable water content in sourdough formulated with chickpea flour

Volume of Sourdough Bread (mL)

  • Unfrozen
  • Frozen
Volume of sourdough bread

Figure 18: Impact of freezing on bread volume in sourdough reformulated with chickpea flour, Data adapted from Ozulku et al., 2017

Application: Gluten-Free Bread

Boulemkahel et al. (2022) evaluated the use of ~33% faba bean flour in the development of additive-free and gluten-free breads in combination with raw and low-pressure homogenized long and medium-grained rice varieties. Homogenization treatment of rice flours resulted in improved bread texture characteristics including decreased hardness and increased cohesiveness, resilience, crumb structure and shape. Another study evaluated the use of 50% raw or fermented faba bean flour in corn starch-based breads (Sozer et al. 2019).

Regardless of pre-treatment, the inclusion of faba bean flour resulted in greater bread volume, porosity and softer texture relative to the 37% soy flour control formulations. In addition, fermentation of faba beans increased the in vitro protein digestibility of the gluten-free breads (Figure 19). Santos et al. (2018) evaluated chickpea flour alone or in combination with cassava starch, maize starch, potato starch and rice flour in the development of gluten-free bread.

Formulations containing solely 100% chickpea flour alone had the highest volume, crumb firmness and lowest crumb moisture compared to breads containing any other single base ingredient. However, loaf volumes of chickpea flour-based breads were positively influenced by the inclusion of either 25% potato or cassava starches. These breads displayed similar overall acceptability scores to wheat-only controls and superior nutrition to a white, gluten-free bread control formulated from rice and potato starch.

Example Formulation: Chickpea/Cassava Starch Bread

Adapted from Santos et al., 2018

Ingredient Amount
Flour/Starch Blend 100 grams
Water 100 grams
Whole Egg 25 grams
Whole Milk Powder 10.5 grams
Sugar 6 grams
Soy Oil 6 grams
Salt 2 grams
Yeast 0.8 grams
Xanthan Gum 0.3 grams
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.3 grams
Ingredient Amount
Flour/Starch Blend 100 grams
Water 100 grams
Whole Egg 25 grams
Whole Milk Powder 10.5 grams
Sugar 6 grams
Soy Oil 6 grams
Salt 2 grams
Yeast 0.8 grams
Xanthan Gum 0.3 grams
Carboxymethylcellulose 0.3 grams

Example Formulation: Rice/Faba Bean Bread

Adapted from Boulemkahel et al., 2022

Flour (2:1 blend of rice:faba bean) Yeast Salt Fungal Alpha-Amylase
100 grams 2 grams 1.5 grams 0.001 grams
Flour (2:1 blend of rice:faba bean) Yeast Salt Fungal Alpha-Amylase
100 grams 2 grams 1.5 grams 0.001 grams

Example Formulation: Faba Bean Bread

Adapted from Sozer et al. 2019

Ingredient Amount
Faba Bean Flour 50 grams
Corn Starch 50 grams
Water 102.6 grams
Sugar 5.7 grams
Shortening 4.9 grams
Yeast 4.9 grams
Baking Powder 2.4 grams
Xanthan Gum 2 grams
Salt 1.7 grams
Emulsifier 0.6 grams
Ingredient Amount
Faba Bean Flour 50 grams
Corn Starch 50 grams
Water 102.6 grams
Sugar 5.7 grams
Shortening 4.9 grams
Yeast 4.9 grams
Baking Powder 2.4 grams
Xanthan Gum 2 grams
Salt 1.7 grams
Emulsifier 0.6 grams

In Vitro Protein Digestibility (%) of Corn Starch Based Gluten-free Breads

  • 37% Soy Flour
  • 50% Raw Faba Bean Flour
  • 50% Fermented Faba Bean Flour
In vitro protein digisbility gluten free

Figure 19: Data from Sozer et al. 2019

Protein and Dietary Fibre Content of Bread

  • 100% Chickpea
  • 75% Chickpea, 25% Potato Starch
  • 75% Chickpea, 25% Cassava Starch
  • Gluten-free, White
  • Wheat Control 1
  • Wheat Control 2
Protein fibre content bread

Figure 20: Data adapted from Santos et al. 2018

Application: Gluten-Free Biscuits

Wesley et al. (2021) evaluated gluten-free biscuits produced with various flour blends using raw and cooked white bean flour in combination with brown, polished, and cooked polished rice. At least two of the rice/bean biscuits developed displayed similar physicochemical properties to the whole wheat flour control. Cooking the bean flour was found to improve the nutritional profile closer to that of the wheat control with higher overall acceptance. The highest acceptability score and purchasing intent by consumers was found for biscuits formulated with a blend of cooked bean flour, brown rice and polished rice flour (Figure 21).

Example Formulations: Rice-Based Biscuits With Pulse Flours

Adapted from Benkadri et al. 2018

Rice Flour Chickpea Flour Water Sugar Hydrogenated Vegetable Fat Xanthan Gum Ammonium Bicarbonate Salt
21.9 g 78.1 g 33 g 18.1 g 13.36 g 0 - 1.5 g 0.9 g 0.75 g
Rice Flour Chickpea Flour Water Sugar Hydrogenated Vegetable Fat Xanthan Gum Ammonium Bicarbonate Salt
21.9 g 78.1 g 33 g 18.1 g 13.36 g 0 - 1.5 g 0.9 g 0.75 g

Other Ingredients: 0.5 g sodium bicarbonate

Adapted from Wesley et al., 2021

Brown Rice Flour Polished Rice Flour Cooked Bean Flour Water Flaxseed Extra Virgin Olive Oil Baking Soda Salt
37.3 g 37.3 g 35 g 41 g 11 g 3 g 3 g 2.4 g
Brown Rice Flour Polished Rice Flour Cooked Bean Flour Water Flaxseed Extra Virgin Olive Oil Baking Soda Salt
37.3 g 37.3 g 35 g 41 g 11 g 3 g 3 g 2.4 g

Other Ingredients: 2 g xantham gum, 1.5 g dehydrated onion

Mean Sensory Scores of Gluten-free Biscuits

  • Whole Wheat Control
  • 25% Raw, White Bean in BRF
  • 32% Cooked, White Bean in PRF
  • 32% Cooked, White Bean in BRF-PRF
  • 20% Raw, White Bean in BRF:CPR
  • 26% Cooked, White Bean in BRF:CPR
Gluten free biscuits

Figure 21: Data adapted from Wesley et al. (2021)

Application: Gluten-Free Cookies

Schmelter et al. (2021) evaluated six faba bean varieties in the production of gluten-free cookies. No differences in baking loss or volume were noted. However, faba bean cookies had a harder texture than the wheat-only control. Because of the flavour notes and darker colour of faba bean cookies, authors suggested that acceptable products could be produced using dehulled faba bean flour with additional flavour- and colour-intense ingredients (eg. cocoa) which could mask the effects of faba bean inclusion. Hajas et al. (2022) evaluated five differently coloured lentils in cookies compared to a rice flour control formulation. Lentil cookies were generally flatter and firmer than their rice counterparts, with similar baking losses but increased protein, phenolic and flavonoid content as well as antioxidant properties. The textural differences between lentil and rice cookies were not detrimental and could serve as a promising flour in gluten-free baking as assessed by a 61-person sensory panel.

Example Formulations: Gluten-Free Cookies with Pulse Flours

Adapted from Schmelter et al. 2021

Whole Faba Bean Flour Butter Sugar Water Egg Powder Baking Powder Salt
100 g 50 g 40 g 17.7 g 5.9 g 1 g 0.6 g
Whole Faba Bean Flour Butter Sugar Water Egg Powder Baking Powder Salt
100 g 50 g 40 g 17.7 g 5.9 g 1 g 0.6 g

Adapted from Hajas et al. 2022

Lentil Flour Sugar 70% Fat Margarine 5% Glucose Solution Water Sodium Bicarbonate Salt
100 g 8 g 28.4 g 14.6 g 7.11 g 1.1 g 0.9 g
Lentil Flour Sugar 70% Fat Margarine 5% Glucose Solution Water Sodium Bicarbonate Salt
100 g 8 g 28.4 g 14.6 g 7.11 g 1.1 g 0.9 g

Application: Gluten-Free Flat Breads & Tortillas

A study evaluated the use of extruded chickpea flours at a 30% inclusion rate in nixtamalized maize tortillas (Bon-Padilla et al., 2022). Extrusion settings were optimized to produce the most functional flour using an extrusion temperature of 143oC and screw speed of 138 rpm. Authors reported that the addition of extruded chickpea flour improved the sensory acceptability, nutritional and anti-hypertensive properties of the tortillas (Figure 22, 23). Another study evaluated chickpea/barley flour mixtures in the production of flatbreads where incorporation of up to 30% chickpea flour improved texture without significantly affecting the most sensory attributes of flatbreads (Mansoor et al., 2021).

Example Formulation: Chickpea-Barley Flatbread

Adapted from Mansoor et al. 2021

70% Chickpea/ 30% Barley Flour Mi Corn Oil Red Chili Salt
100 g 10 g 5 g 2 g
70% Chickpea/ 30% Barley Flour Mi Corn Oil Red Chili Salt
100 g 10 g 5 g 2 g

Protein and Fibre Content of Corn Tortillas

  • Control
  • 30% Extruded Chickpea Flour
Protein fibre corn tortillas

Figure 22: Protein & fibre content of corn tortillas formulated with 30% chickpea flour

Calculated Protein Efficiency Ratio and Anti-hypertensive Potential of Corn Tortillas

  • Control
  • 30% Extruded Chickpea
Calculated protein efficiency corn tortillas

Figure 23: PER and anti-hypertensive potential of corn tortillas formulated with 30% chickpea flour

In Vitro Protein Digestibility (%)

In vitro protein digestibility corn tortillas

Figure 24: Protein digestibility of corn tortillas formulated with 30% chickpea flour, Data from Bon-Padilla et al. (2022)

Application: Gluten-Free Muffins

A study by Jeong et al. (2021) evaluated a combination of heat-treated mung bean and cowpea flours blended with waxy rice flour to produce gluten-free muffins. The addition of pulse flours lowered the specific volume with increased final product hardness (most prominent at the 80% inclusion level) however, did improve the overall nutritional profile of muffins, particularly through increases in total protein content (Figure 25). Optimal physical, texture, and sensory appearance were obtained using a 1:1 pulse-rice flour blend, where sensory properties were nearly identical to those of 100% wheat-only control muffins.

Example Formulation: Gluten-Free Muffins with Mung bean and Cowpea Flours

Adapted from Jeong et al. 2021

Pulse/Waxy Rice Flour Blend Sugar Butter Baking Powder Salt
100 g 60 g 40 g 3 g 1 g
Pulse/Waxy Rice Flour Blend Sugar Butter Baking Powder Salt
100 g 60 g 40 g 3 g 1 g

Protein Content Relative to the Control

Pecent increase protein content

Figure 25: % Increase in protein relative to control. Data adapted from Jeong et al. (2021)

Application: Gluten-Free Crackers

Han et al. (2010) evaluated the use of multiple pulse flours (including desi chickpea, green lentil, red lentil, pinto bean, navy bean, and yellow pea) and yellow pea fractions to produce gluten-free cracker formulations. Crackers made in one and four-dot moulds scored well on the consumer sensory acceptance test with similar physical properties compared to commercial control crackers. Chickpea crackers were successfully scaled up in a commercial trial, containing 3-6 times more of the iron daily recommended value with otherwise similar nutritional properties to existing crackers in the marketplace. Another study successfully incorporated up to 40% chickpea flour in corn and potato flour-based cracker formulations (Kamel et al., 2020). The addition of chickpea flour increased the protein content and enhanced the amino acid profile. The sensory properties of the crackers were well received by panellists.

Example Formulations: Gluten-Free Crackers with Pulse Flours

Adapted from Kamel et al. 2020

Corn/Potato/ Chickpea Flour Blend Fat Salt Seasoning Lecithin Xanthan Gum Sodium Bicarbonate Sodium Metabisulphite
100 g 25 g 2.5 g Cumin - 1.9 g; Anise - 1.9 g; Black Pepper Seed - 1.3 g 1.3 g 0.9 g 0.3 g 0.3 g
Corn/Potato/ Chickpea Flour Blend Fat Salt Seasoning Lecithin Xanthan Gum Sodium Bicarbonate Sodium Metabisulphite
100 g 25 g 2.5 g Cumin - 1.9 g; Anise - 1.9 g; Black Pepper Seed - 1.3 g 1.3 g 0.9 g 0.3 g 0.3 g

Adapted from Han et al. 2010

Pulse Flour Water Oil Salt Chemical Leavening Agent Hydrocolloid Gum
100 g 27 - 33 g 20 - 27 g 3 - 4 g 0.6 - 0.8 g 0.6 - 0.8 g
Pulse Flour Water Oil Salt Chemical Leavening Agent Hydrocolloid Gum
100 g 27 - 33 g 20 - 27 g 3 - 4 g 0.6 - 0.8 g 0.6 - 0.8 g

Nutritional Composition of Gluten-Free Crackers

Nutritional composition of the gluten-free cracker produced from the commercial-scale processing trial (Sample name: four-dot mould-shaped cracker).
Adapted from Han et al. (2010)

Component Method Concentration Unit
Calories Calculate 445.58 Per 100 g
Fat, Total AOAC Solvent Extraction 13.30 %
Saturated Fatty Acids AOAC 996.06 1.18 %
Trans-Fatty Acids AOAC 996.06 0.00 %
Monounsaturated Fatty Acids AOAC 996.06 9.42 %
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids AOAC 996.06 3.12 %
Cholesterol AOAC 996.06 1.53 mg/100 g
Total Carbohydrate Calculate 70.79 %
Total Dietary Fibre AOAC 992.16/985.29 5.40 %
Sugars HPLC-RI 6.02 %
Protein AOAC 981.10/993.13 10.68 %
Sodium ICP-MS 1140 mg/100 g
Iron ICP-MS 2.80 mg/100 g
Moisture Oven-drying at 105 C 0.86 %
Ash AOAC 923.02 4.37 %
Omega 3 GC-FID 0.23 %
Omega 6 GC-FID 2.89 %
Omega 9 GC-FID 9.38 %
Component Method Concentration Unit
Calories Calculate 445.58 Per 100 g
Fat, Total AOAC Solvent Extraction 13.30 %
Saturated Fatty Acids AOAC 996.06 1.18 %
Trans-Fatty Acids AOAC 996.06 0.00 %
Monounsaturated Fatty Acids AOAC 996.06 9.42 %
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids AOAC 996.06 3.12 %
Cholesterol AOAC 996.06 1.53 mg/100 g
Total Carbohydrate Calculate 70.79 %
Total Dietary Fibre AOAC 992.16/985.29 5.40 %
Sugars HPLC-RI 6.02 %
Protein AOAC 981.10/993.13 10.68 %
Sodium ICP-MS 1140 mg/100 g
Iron ICP-MS 2.80 mg/100 g
Moisture Oven-drying at 105 C 0.86 %
Ash AOAC 923.02 4.37 %
Omega 3 GC-FID 0.23 %
Omega 6 GC-FID 2.89 %
Omega 9 GC-FID 9.38 %

The Science

What are the effects of pulse inclusion on dough handling?

The high protein and fibre content of pulse flours will typically result in increased water absorption, often described as stickier doughs. The sticky doughs are accompanied by an increase in dough development time that is attributed to the interaction between pulse proteins and gluten which delays hydration and the gluten network development (Kohajdova et al. 2013). As a result, dough stability is often accordingly decreased. It has been suggested to alleviate the effects of pulse inclusion on dough stickiness, the optimal water inclusion level should be reduced (Aiken, 2016; Xing et al. 2021) or the inclusion level can be adjusted so that minimal effects on dough handling occur. For example, Bourre et al. (2019) reported that the addition of 10% roasted, split yellow pea flour did not affect dough rheology. The addition of dough strengtheners and conditioners such as vital wheat gluten and hydrocolloids are also commonly applied in commercial baking to improve the dough handling of pulse-containing products.

What are the effects of pulse inclusion on colour?

The addition of pulse flour into baked systems will typically result in a darker crumb colour as a result of Maillard and caramelization reactions during baking. The intrinsic colour of the pulse will also have an effect on the end product colour; where green pea flour may increase green hues or red lentil flour might increase red hues in the final product. Some pulse types, such as navy beans, have little colour pigmentation which results in smaller differences in the colour of baked products.

Colour

  • Control
  • 20% finely ground dehulled yellow pea
  • 20% coarsely ground dehulled yellow pea
  • 20% finely ground dehulled navy bean
  • 20% coarsely ground dehulled navy bean
  • 20% finely ground dehulled red lentil
  • 20% coarsely ground dehulled red lentil
Colour

Figure 26: Effect of pulse flour inclusion on the Minolta Chroma meter colour measurements of bread. Adapted from Bourre et al. (2019)

What are the effects of pulse flour inclusion on final product flavour?

A large proportion of grassy, beany, and bitter off-flavours and aromas from pulses are the products of the enzymatic degradation of linoleic and linolenic acid by lipoxygenase that is initiated during harvest and transportation of the crop, further catalyzed as air is introduced during dough mixing (Krause et al, 2022b). Krause et al. evaluated the inclusion of yellow pea, green pea, chickpea, lentil and heat-treated lupin flour on the production of volatile compounds (VOCs) in cakes. The lipoxygenase activity of raw pulse flours ranged from 2510-4350 nkat/g resulting in significantly higher total VOC content for batters and cakes relative to the control. Interestingly, batters containing chickpea and lentil flours, displayed lower concentrations of total VOC content than batters containing yellow and green pea flour. This was attributed to the higher concentration of antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols in chickpeas and lentils that could serve to decelerate the oxidative reaction of lipoxygenase. The inactivation of lipoxygenase activity as a result of the heat treatment applied to lupin flour corresponded to minimal concentrations of VOC comparable to the control. Heat treatments that inactivate lipoxygenase activity are commonly applied by industry as a tool to produce flours with decreased intensity of off-flavours and aromas. Otherwise, careful selection of substitution rates and flavour masking ingredients (ex: cocoa) can be applied to minimize the influence of pulse flour ingredients in baked goods.

Total VOCs (ug/g sample) in Batter

Total voc batter

Figure 27: Total concentration of volatile compounds in cake batter containing pulse flours. Data adapted from Krause et al. (2022b).

What is the effect of flour particle size on final product quality?

Particle size distribution is one of the most important parameters to consider when sourcing a pulse flour for baked goods as it significantly affects its processability and ease of handling. Finer ground flours display lower water absorption due to differences in the association between protein and starch and the degree of starch damage (Zucco et al., 2011). Fine flours are typically preferred as less water is required during mixing to sufficiently hydrate the protein network while still maintaining a machinable dough. Bourre et al. (2019) found that bread doughs produced using 10% finely ground pulse flours (90% of particles < 300 mm) displayed lower water absorption, higher pasting viscosity, as well as superior bread scores with a tighter crumb structure. In this study, particle size was not found to significantly influence bread volume or sensory characteristics. Gomez et al. (2022) reported that more evenly distributed particles were easier to include and produced a more cohesive dough in muffins containing 10% pea flour. Interestingly, cookies produced from 23-75% inclusion of coarse pulse flour (90% of particles <500 mm,) resulted in a softer texture with an increased spread ratio (Zucco et al., 2011). Differences in the particle size distribution based on the type of baked product evaluated emphasize the importance when sourcing pulse flours for baking.

Figure 28
Figure 29

Percent starch damage (A) and water absorption capacity (B) for pulse flours milled to different particle size distributions using various screen sizes. Crumb firmness (C) is reported for bread baked substituting 20% of wheat flour in the formulation; constant baking absorption levels were applied for loaves of bread within pulse market classes using optimized mix and proof times. Letter differences within a pulse market class indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between means. Data adapted from Bourre et al. (2019)

What is the effect of treatments on final product quality?

Additional processing may be applied to the pulse seed prior to milling or on the resulting flour to influence its composition, functionality and sensory properties. The most common commercially applied technique is the use of heat or steam to improve flavour and aroma. Kotsiou et al. (2021) reported that bread formulated with 10-20% roasted, split yellow pea flour effectively inhibited the beany and grass-like off-flavour notes present in raw pea flour formulations. At the 10% inclusion level, no differences were observed on dough rheological performance, bread texture and shelf life. Frolich et al. (2021) evaluated the effects of infrared heating and roasting on the resulting yellow pea, navy bean and faba bean flour performance when incorporated at a rate of 30% in pita and tortilla formulations. The applied treatments were responsible for a reduction in the seed moisture content that increased the level of starch damage that occurred during milling. As a result, thermally treated flour displayed increased water absorption capacities that were also attributed to the partial thermal denaturation of proteins. Infrared heat treatment was found to be most successful in the reduction of off-flavours for both pita and tortillas with the highest purchase intent scores after consumer sensory panels. Roasted pulse flours have also been reported to produce a darker crust colour in baked products than raw or alternative heat treatments.

What are the differences between pulse types?

Each pulse type is unique and thus differently affects the final product quality of baked goods, most notably are differences in composition and seed characteristics including size and colour. The table below highlights reported differences in product quality by pulse type:

Applications Effect of Pulse Type Reference
Applications

Bread

Effect of Pulse Type

Common bean, chickpea, faba bean and red lentil:

  • Common bean and chickpea flour yielded superior sensory properties similar to control
  • Common bean and faba bean needed higher volumes of water to reach optimal dough consistency
  • Red lentil and faba bean flours created a more thermally stable composite flour network, with no effect on retrogradation relative to control
  • Faba bean flour produced the lowest bread volume and highest detectable leguminous flavours and aromas
  • Darker crust colours were obtained from chickpea, common bean and faba bean
  • Red lentil produced the most suitable bread volume, followed by chickpea
Reference

Bojnanska et al. (2021)

Applications

Pita Bread

Effect of Pulse Type

Green lentils, navy beans, and pinto beans:

  • Lentil flour had the most significant effect on colour, navy bean had little effect
  • Pinto bean yielded superior texture and overall acceptability in sensory evaluation
  • Coarsely ground pinto and navy beans produced the most acceptable quality with superior performance relative to control
  • The diameter of pitas produced from navy bean was significantly affected by substitution level, not the case for lentil and pinot beans
  • Pinto bean had lowest specific loaf volume
Reference

Borsuk et al. (2012)

Applications

Bread

Effect of Pulse Type

Yellow pea, navy bean, and red lentil:

  • Regardless of mill screen size, navy bean produced the widest particle size distribution with lowest level of starch damage and highest water absorption capacity
  • Differences in the hardness of red lentil flour produced higher level of starch damage with wider particle size range than similarly milled yellow pea flour, affect its performance
  • Slightly longer mixing time for bread doughs made with fine yellow pea and red lentil flour, opposite to navy bean
  • Highest sensory scores for ferkar milled pea flour; navy bean high colour, texture and resilience with lower softness and crumb strength; lentils scored high in colour but lower in softness
Reference

Bourre et al (2019)

Applications

Tortilla and Pitas

Effect of Pulse Type

Yellow pea, navy bean and faba bean:

  • Higher intent to purchase scores were obtained for tortillas and pitas produced from micronized navy bean and yellow pea flours
Reference

Frolich et al. (2021)

Applications

Sponge cake

Effect of Pulse Type

Lentil, chickpea, lupin, green pea and yellow pea:

  • Pea batters were the most abundant in oxidation markets associated with greeny-beany flavours
  • Pleasant nutty and roasted flavours were reported in lentil and chickpea cakes
  • Lentil flour had the most pronounced effect on darkening sponge cake colour
Reference

Krause et al. (2022)

Applications

Baked crackers

Effect of Pulse Type

Faba bean, yellow pea, and green pea:

  • Consumer preferred yellow pea and faba bean crackers relative to wheat-only crackers
  • Yellow pea and faba bean increased red hue of crackers, green increased green hues
  • Faba bean crackers were the hardest, but had higher total phenolic content
Reference

Millar et al. (2017)

Applications

Wafers

Effect of Pulse Type

Lentil, chickpea and common bean:

  • Chickpea had the least influence on hardness, with lowest weight loss during baking
  • Bean waters had highest hardness
  • Bean containing batters had highest consistency and lentil the lowest related to the differences in fiber and associated water retention capacity of the flours
  • Strongest browning and colour development in lentil and bean wafers
Reference

Tufan et al. (2020)

Applications

Cookies

Effect of Pulse Type

Navy bean, pinto bean, green lentil and yellow pea:

  • Green lentil flour produced undesirable structure and sticky texture and harder cookie exture
  • Navy bean cookies had similar texture to wheat-only control
  • Coarse pinto bean flour produced cookies with highest whiteness value
  • Pinto bean flour had the most pronounced effect on antioxidant activity of cookies
Reference

Zucco et al. (2011)

Applications

Bread

Effect of Pulse Type

Yellow pea, commercial yellow pea (smaller particle size) green pea, red lentil, and chickpea:

  • Yellow pea and chickpea demonstrated superior dough handling and product quality
  • Chickpea flour had the highest cooking stability
  • 5% yellow pea bread had comparable mixing properties to control dough, with good bread volume
  • 25% green pea and red lentil decreased bread volume
  • Commercial yellow pea flour demonstrated the fastest moisture decrease rate in stored bread, where chickpea was the slowest
  • Peak viscosity for pasting curves containing pulse flours was yellow pea < green pea < chickpea < red lentil < commercial yellow pea
Reference

Zhang et al. (2021)

What are some processing strategies that can be used to improve final product quality?

Improvements in the nutritional profile of baked goods because of pulse flour addition often comes at the expense of final product quality. However, modifications to either the formulation and/or baking process have been studied for their effects on improving final product quality.

Effect of Baking Time

Millar et al. (2017) evaluated the effect of increasing the baking time at 175 oC from 21 to 31 min for crackers formulated with 40% faba bean, yellow pea, and green pea flours. Water activity of crackers baked at 21 minutes was significantly higher. At prolonged baking times, Maillard browning was responsible for intensifying colour deviations, where crackers displayed increased golden colour and red hues even when green pea flour was applied. The effect of baking time on cracker texture was dependent on pulse type, whereby faba bean crackers baked for 31 min and yellow pea crackers baked for 21 min were the hardest.

Effect of Mixing Time

Krause et al. (2022c) identified the duration of mixing after oil addition in sponge cake systems to have an influence on the potential development of volatile compounds associated with off-flavors and aromas in the final product. This was hypothesized to the be result of a prolonged point of contact between lipoxygenase with fatty acids that may facilitate their oxidation. The mixing time after the addition of oil was identified specifically due to its importance in creating a more uniformly distributed dough with smaller air bubbles and fat particles that results in larger surface areas for chemical reactions to occur. Extension of the mixing time after flour addition alone did not result in any significant changes in the primary or secondary metabolites of lipid oxidation and thus had no apparent effect on the concentration of volatile compounds.

Effect of Pre-Ferment and Vital Wheat Gluten Addition

Bread formulated with 20% lupin flour was produced using two baking systems in conjunction with 0-5% addition of vital gluten powder (Pleming et al., 2021). The first baking system evaluated represented a rapid process in which all ingredients were mixed with vital wheat gluten to produce a dough, then rested (20 min at 28 oC) moulded, proofed (45 min at 38oC, 85% RH) and baked for 12 minutes at 214 oC. The alternative baking system applied incorporated a sponge & dough process in which 70% of the water and flour were mixed with malt flour, calcium dihydrogen orthophosphate, ammonium sulphate, ascorbic acid and dry active yeast that was allowed to ferment for 45 min at 28 oC to produce a “sponge”. After fermentation, the sponge was mixed with remaining flour, water, vital wheat gluten, fat, sugar and salt before entering the same mixing, moulding, proofing and baking process as applied to the rapidly baked bread. The pre-ferment applied in the sponge and dough process allowed for more time for the lupin protein and fibre components to bind water, lessening the free water available in the system. As a result, the rate of staling for breads produced using the sponge and dough process was decreased, with further retarding upon the addition of vital wheat gluten. Vital wheat gluten addition was instrumental in improving the dough handling, bread loaf volume, and final crumb texture of breads formulated with lupin flour.

When vital wheat gluten cannot be used:

  • The addition of xanthan gum to gluten-free, rice-chickpea biscuits has been reported to improve springiness, cohesiveness and adhesiveness with accompanying increases in hardness and elasticity (Bankadri et al.)
  • The addition of proteases was successful in inhibiting the development of large protein aggregates responsible for disrupting the starch-gel structure that contributes to texture in gluten-free bread, ensuring a more cohesive and continuous dough structure with softer crumb (Renzetti et al., 2022)
  • Microwave-infrared cooking as an alternative to conventional baking produced legume cakes with higher specific volume although greater weight loss and more profound crust colour changes (Ozkahraman et al., 2016).

The inclusion of dextrans in sprouted barley and lentil flour sourdough resulted in improved final product structure (Perri et al., 2021)

Sponge and dough percent optimal water absorption

  • 0% Gluten
  • 2% Gluten
  • 3.5% Gluten
  • 5% Gluten
Sponge dough water absorption

Rapid percent optimal water absorption

  • 0% Gluten
  • 2% Gluten
  • 3.5% Gluten
  • 5% Gluten
Rapid water absorption

Sponge and dough mixing time

  • 0% Gluten
  • 2% Gluten
  • 3.5% Gluten
  • 5% Gluten
Sponge dough mixing

Rapid mixing time

  • 0% Gluten
  • 2% Gluten
  • 3.5% Gluten
  • 5% Gluten
Rapid mixing

Sponge and dough bread volume

  • 0% Gluten
  • 2% Gluten
  • 3.5% Gluten
  • 5% Gluten
Sponge dough bread volume

Rapid bread volume

  • 0% Gluten
  • 2% Gluten
  • 3.5% Gluten
  • 5% Gluten
Rapid bread volume

Effect of lupin variety and gluten addition level on optimum water absorption level (top), dough mixing time (middle) and bread volume (bottom) for bread formulated with 20% lupin flour produced using the sponge and dough (left) or rapid (right) breadmaking process. Control is wheat-only bread, data adapted from Pleming et al. (2021).

References

Aiken, L. (2016, February 26). On the pulse. Bakers Journal.

Atudorei, D., Atudorei, O., & Codină, G. G. (2021). Dough Rheological Properties, Microstructure and Bread Quality of Wheat-Germinated Bean Composite Flour. Foods, 10(7), 1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071542

Baik, B.-K., & Han, I. H. (2012). Cooking, Roasting, and Fermentation of Chickpeas, Lentils, Peas, and Soybeans for Fortification of Leavened Bread. Cereal Chemistry Journal, 89(6), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-04-12-0047-R

Benkadri, S., Salvador, A., Zidoune, M. N., & Sanz, T. (2018). Gluten-free biscuits based on composite rice–chickpea flour and xanthan gum. Food Science and Technology International, 24(7), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013218779323

Bojňanská, T., Musilová, J., & Vollmannová, A. (2021). Effects of Adding Legume Flours on the Rheological and Breadmaking Properties of Dough. Foods, 10(5), 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051087

Bon-Padilla, B.K., Reyes-Moreno, C., Milan-Carrilo, J., Reynoso-Camacho, R., Gomez-Aldapa, C.A., Gomez-Favela, M.A. & Gutierrez-Dorado, R. (2022) Tortillas made from nixtamalized maize and extruded chickpea flour: a product with improved in vitro and nutritional and antihypertensive properties. Cereal Chemistry, 99, 1154-1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10577

Borsuk, Y., Arntfield, S., Lukow, O. M., Swallow, K., & Malcolmson, L. (2012). Incorporation of pulse flours of different particle size in relation to pita bread quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92(10), 2055–2061. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5581

Boulemkahel, S., Garzon, R., Benatallah, L., & Rosell, C. M. (2022). Development of gluten‐free bread using low‐pressure homogenized rice flour supplemented with faba bean flour. Cereal Chemistry, 99(2), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10498

Bourré, L., Frohlich, P., Young, G., Borsuk, Y., Sopiwnyk, E., Sarkar, A., Nickerson, M. T., Ai, Y., Dyck, A., & Malcolmson, L. (2019). Influence of particle size on flour and baking properties of yellow pea, navy bean, and red lentil flours. Cereal Chemistry, 96(4), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10161

Bourré, L., McMillin, K., Borsuk, Y., Boyd, L., Lagassé, S., Sopiwnyk, E., Jones, S., Dyck, A., & Malcolmson, L. (2019). Effect of adding fermented split yellow pea flour as a partial replacement of wheat flour in bread. Legume Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.2

Chaudhary, A., Marinangeli, C.P.F., Tremorin, D. & Mathys, A. (2018). Nutritional combined greenhouse gas life cycle analysis for incorporating Canadian yellow pea into cereal based food. Nutrients. 10, 490 doi:10.3390/nu10040490

Coda, R., Varis, J., Verni, M., Rizzello, C. G., & Katina, K. (2017). Improvement of the protein quality of wheat bread through faba bean sourdough addition. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 82, 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.04.062

Dabija, A., Codina, G. G., & Fradinho, P. (2017). Effects of yellow pea flour addition on wheat flour dough and bread quality . Romanian Biotechnological Letters , 22(5).

Fabek,H., Sanchez-Hernandez, D., Ahmed, M., Anderson, G.H, Marinangeli, C.P.F., House, J.D. & Anderson, G. H. (2021). An examination of contributions of animal and plant based dietary patterns on the nutrient quality of diets of adult Canadians. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 46, 877-886. dx.doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2020-1039

Fahmi, R., Ryland, D., Sopiwnyk, E., & Aliani, M. (2019). Sensory and Physical Characteristics of Pan Bread Fortified with Thermally Treated Split Yellow Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Flour. Journal of Food Science, 84(12), 3735–3745. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14908

Frohlich, P., Young, G., Borsuk, Y., Sigvaldson, M., Bourré, L., & Sopiwnyk, E. (2021). Influence of premilling thermal treatments of yellow peas, navy beans, and fava beans on the flavor and end‐product quality of tortillas and pitas. Cereal Chemistry, 98(3), 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10424

Fujiwara, N., Hall, C., & Jenkins, A. L. (2017). Development of Low Glycemic Index (GI) Foods by Incorporating Pulse Ingredients into Cereal-Based Products: Use of In Vitro Screening and In Vivo Methodologies. Cereal Chemistry Journal, 94(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-04-16-0119-FI

Gallego, C., Belorio, M., Guerra‐Oliveira, P., & Gómez, M. (2022). Effects of adding chickpea and chestnut flours to layer cakes. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 57(8), 4840–4846. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15719

Gomes, D. de S., Rosa, L. S., Cordoba, L. do P., Fiorda-Mello, F., Spier, M. R., & Waszczynskyj, N. (2022). Development of muffins with green pea flour and their physical and sensory evaluation and essential amino acid content. Ciência Rural, 52(7). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20200693

Gómez, M., Doyagüe, M. J., & de la Hera, E. (2012). Addition of pin-milled pea flour and air-classified fractions in layer and sponge cakes. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 46(1), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.10.014

Hajas, L., Sipos, L., Csobod, É. C., Bálint, M. V., Juhász, R., & Benedek, C. (2022). Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Flour Varieties as Promising New Ingredients for Gluten-Free Cookies. Foods, 11(14), 2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142028

Han, J. (Jay), Janz, J. A. M., & Gerlat, M. (2010). Development of gluten-free cracker snacks using pulse flours and fractions. Food Research International, 43(2), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.015

Jeong, D., Hong, J. S., Liu, Q., Choi, H., & Chung, H. (2021). The effects of different levels of heat‐treated legume flour on nutritional, physical, textural, and sensory properties of gluten‐free muffins. Cereal Chemistry, 98(2), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10379

Kamel, M. A.-A., ALy, M. H. H., & Abd-El-Khalek Mokhtar. (2020). Preparation of Gluten-Free Corn Crackers Supplemented with Some Legume Flours. Journal of Advanced Research in Food Science and Nutrition, 03(01), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.24321/2582.3892.202006

Kohajdová, Z., Karovičová, J., & Magala, M. (2013). Effect of lentil and bean flours on rheological and baking properties of wheat dough. Chemical Papers, 67(4). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-012-0295-3

Kotsiou, K., Sacharidis, D.-D., Matsakidou, A., Biliaderis, C. G., & Lazaridou, A. (2021). Impact of Roasted Yellow Split Pea Flour on Dough Rheology and Quality of Fortified Wheat Breads. Foods, 10(8), 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081832

Krause, S., Keller, S., Hashemi, A., Descharles, N., Bonazzi, C., & Rega, B. (2022). From flours to cakes: Reactivity potential of pulse ingredients to generate volatile compounds impacting the quality of processed foods. Food Chemistry, 371, 131379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131379

Mansoor, R., Ali, T.M. & Hasnain, A. (2021). Effects of barley flour substitution on glycemic index, compositional, rheological, textural and sensory characteristics of chickpea flour based flat bread. Legume Science, 3:e89. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.89

Marinangeli, C.P.F. (2020). Complementing cereal grains with pulse grains to enhance the nutrition and environmental sustainability profiles of manufactured foods in Canada and the United States. Cereal Foods World, 65(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0063

Millar, K. A., Barry-Ryan, C., Burke, R., Hussey, K., McCarthy, S., & Gallagher, E. (2017). Effect of pulse flours on the physiochemical characteristics and sensory acceptance of baked crackers. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 52(5), 1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13388

Millar, K. A., Barry-Ryan, C., Burke, R., McCarthy, S., & Gallagher, E. (2019). Dough properties and baking characteristics of white bread, as affected by addition of raw, germinated and toasted pea flour. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 56, 102189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102189

Mohammed, I., Ahmed, A. R., & Senge, B. (2014). Effects of chickpea flour on wheat pasting properties and bread making quality. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(9), 1902–1910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0733-9

Muldabekova, B. Zh., Umirzakova, G. A., Assangaliyeva, Z. R., Maliktayeva, P. M., Zheldybayeva, A. A., & Yakiyayeva, M. A. (2022). Nutritional Evaluation of Buns Developed from Chickpea-Mung Bean Composite Flour and Sugar Beet Powder. International Journal of Food Science, 2022, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6009998

Ouazib, M., Garzon, R., Zaidi, F., & Rosell, C. M. (2016). Germinated, toasted and cooked chickpea as ingredients for breadmaking. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(6), 2664–2672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2238-4

Ozkahraman, B. C., Sumnu, G., & Sahin, S. (2016). Effect of different flours on quality of legume cakes to be baked in microwave-infrared combination oven and conventional oven. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(3), 1567–1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2101-z

Ozulku, G., & Arıcı, M. (2017). Characterization of the rheological and technological properties of the frozen sourdough bread with chickpea flour addition. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 11(3), 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9528-z

Perri, G., Rizzello, C. G., Ampollini, M., Celano, G., Coda, R., Gobbetti, M., de Angelis, M., & Calasso, M. (2021). Bioprocessing of Barley and Lentil Grains to Obtain In Situ Synthesis of Exopolysaccharides and Composite Wheat Bread with Improved Texture and Health Properties. Foods, 10(7), 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071489

Pleming, D., Farahnaky, A., & Majzoobi, M. (2021). Effects of bread making methods, lupin variety and gluten powder on the quality of bread enriched with high percentage of lupin flour. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 56(12), 6707–6718. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15323

Plustea, L., Negrea, M., Cocan, I., Radulov, I., Tulcan, C., Berbecea, A., Popescu, I., Obistioiu, D., Hotea, I., Suster, G., Boeriu, A. E., & Alexa, E. (2022). Lupin (Lupinus spp.)-Fortified Bread: A Sustainable, Nutritionally, Functionally, and Technologically Valuable Solution for Bakery. Foods, 11(14), 2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142067

Qayyum, A., Munir, M., Raza, S., Gillani, M., Kanwal, S., Rashid, N., Mumtaz, A., Safdar, N., & Gillani, Z. (2017). Rheological and Qualitative Assessment of Wheat-Pea Composite Flour and its Utilization in Biscuits. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2017.30.3.258.265

Rababah, T. M., Al-Mahasneh, M. A., & Ereifej, K. I. (2006). Effect of Chickpea, Broad Bean, or Isolated Soy Protein Additions on the Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Biscuits. Journal of Food Science, 71(6), S438–S442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00077.x

Renzetti, S., Heetesonne, I., Ngadze, R. T., & Linnemann, A. R. (2022). Dry Heating of Cowpea Flour below Biopolymer Melting Temperatures Improves the Physical Properties of Bread Made from Climate-Resilient Crops. Foods, 11(11), 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11111554

Rizzello, C. G., Calasso, M., Campanella, D., de Angelis, M., & Gobbetti, M. (2014). Use of sourdough fermentation and mixture of wheat, chickpea, lentil and bean flours for enhancing the nutritional, texture and sensory characteristics of white bread. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 180, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.04.005

Santos, F. G., Fratelli, C., Muniz, D. G., & Capriles, V. D. (2018). Mixture Design Applied to the Development of Chickpea-Based Gluten-Free Bread with Attractive Technological, Sensory, and Nutritional Quality. Journal of Food Science, 83(1), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14009

Schmelter, L., Rohm, H., & Struck, S. (2021). Gluten-free bakery products: Cookies made from different Vicia faba bean varieties. Future Foods, 4, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100038

Sibian, M. S., & Riar, C. S. (2020). Formulation and characterization of cookies prepared from the composite flour of germinated kidney bean, chickpea, and wheat. Legume Science, leg3.42. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.42

Sozer, N., Melama, L., Silbir, S., Rizzello, C. G., Flander, L., & Poutanen, K. (2019). Lactic Acid Fermentation as a Pre-Treatment Process for Faba Bean Flour and Its Effect on Textural, Structural and Nutritional Properties of Protein-Enriched Gluten-Free Faba Bean Breads. Foods, 8(10), 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100431

Thongram, S., Tanwar, B., Chauhan, A., & Kumar, V. (2016). Physicochemical and organoleptic properties of cookies incorporated with legume flours. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1172389

Tufan, B., Sahin, S., & Sumnu, G. (2020). Utilization of legume flours in wafer sheets. Legume Science, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.12

Wesley, S. D., André, B. H. M., & Clerici, M. T. P. S. (2021). Gluten-free rice & bean biscuit: characterization of a new food product. Heliyon, 7(1), e05956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05956

Xing, Q., Kyriakopoulou, K., Zhang, L., Boom, R. M., & Schutyser, M. A. I. (2021). Protein fortification of wheat bread using dry fractionated chickpea protein-enriched fraction or its sourdough. LWT, 142, 110931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110931

Yadav, R. B., Yadav, B. S., & Dhull, N. (2012). Effect of incorporation of plantain and chickpea flours on the quality characteristics of biscuits. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0271-x

Young, G., Bourré, L., Frohlich, P., Borsuk, Y., Sarkar, A., Sopiwnyk, E., Jones, S., Dyck, A., & Malcolmson, L. (2020). Effect of roasting as a premilling treatment on the functional and bread baking properties of whole yellow pea flour. Cereal Chemistry, 97(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10233

Zhang, Y., Hu, R., Tilley, M., Siliveru, K., & Li, Y. (2021). Effect of Pulse Type and Substitution Level on Dough Rheology and Bread Quality of Whole Wheat-Based Composite Flours. Processes, 9(9), 1687. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091687

Zucco, F., Borsuk, Y., & Arntfield, S. D. (2011). Physical and nutritional evaluation of wheat cookies supplemented with pulse flours of different particle sizes. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 44(10), 2070–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.06.007