Pulses in Bakery


Enhance your nutrition and sustainability messaging with clean label ingredients
Baked goods are a staple component of diets around the world. A study of nutrient intakes from diets as reported by Canadian adults found that as the percentage of total daily protein intake from plant sources increased, the primary protein source was from cereal-based food sources (breads, rolls, crackers, and grains) and the intake of other plant protein sources such as legumes was low (Fabek et al., 2021). It is well known that plant protein sources are typically deficient in one or more of the indispensable amino acids. Relying on one type of plant protein introduces risk for groups consuming higher proportions of their daily total protein intake from plant sources.
Reformulating cereal foods with pulse flours is an immense opportunity to improve the protein quality of baked products and address potential dietary intake concerns because of their significantly higher protein contents and the complementary nature of their amino acid profiles.
The addition of pulse ingredients to cereal foods can also complement the nutritional profile of products through combined increases in fibre, folate, iron, potassium, and other micronutrients (Marinangeli, 2020). A study examining the effect of reformulated traditional pan bread with 15% whole yellow pea flour not only reported significant improvements in the nutritional quality of the product but also noted a 4% decrease in the CO2 equivalent per kg of food (Chaudhary et al., 2018).
Working with pulse flour in baked products
Increasing the inclusion level of pulse flour typically results in proportional increases in nutritional quality. However, this may be at the expense of dough-handling properties and machinability. The higher protein and fibre present in pulse flours may reduce free water available in the system or physically interfere with dough handling. The reduced dough hydration and development may result in baked goods with a more densely packed microstructure exhibited as a reduction in product volume accompanied by increased product firmness.
However, many studies have identified substitution rates in which the nutrition profile is successfully enhanced with minimal effects on handling, product quality, and sensory properties. Specific inclusion rates based on the category of baked goods are highlighted in the sections below.
Bread, Biscuits, Buns & Rolls, Cake, Cookies & Wafers, Flatbreads, Pitas & Tortillas, Sourdough, Gluten-free Bread, Gluten-free Biscuits, Gluten-free Cookies, Gluten-free Flatbreads & Tortillas, Gluten-free Muffins, Gluten-free Crackers
Increase protein content, increase protein quality, increase carbohydrate quality, increase slowly digestible starch, increase total dietary fibre, increase vitamins and minerals, low glycemic index
Clean label, improved nutrition, better-for-you indulgence, sustainability
Application: Bread


Pulse flours have successfully substituted up to 30% of wheat flour in the formulation of Yeast-leavened breads. Typical formulations comprise of simple flour, yeast and salt but many other additional ingredients from sugars and fats to dough conditioners and improvers have also been evaluated. Hydration rates for pulse-containing bread doughs are variable depending on the formulation, pulse type, flour composition and particle size. A breakdown of bread formulations and hydration levels according to pulse type has been provided in the table below.
Adding pulse flours to pan breads successfully improves the nutritional profile relative to control formulations through increases in total protein and complex carbohydrates such as fibre, resistant starch and slowly digestible starch. For instance, 20% pea flour inclusion in a wheat-based bread increased protein by up to 25% and fibre by up to 90% (Figure 1, 2, Kotsiou et al., 2021). A study evaluating 16% inclusion of dehulled green lentil flour reduced the glycemic index in vivo by 13%, changing the GI category of the focaccia bread from "medium" to "low" (Figure 3, Fujiwara et al., 2017).
Example Bread Formulations with Pulse Flours
Pulse Type | Pulse Inclusion (%flour) | Water Addition (%) | Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pulse Type germinated, whole bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 53.7 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 3g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Atudori et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type germinated, whole bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 53 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 3g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Atudori et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type germinated, whole bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 52.7 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 3g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference 3g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Pulse Type germinated, whole bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) 52 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 3g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference 3g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Pulse Type raw, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 52 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type cooked, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 68 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type fermented, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 74 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type roasted, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 62 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type raw, whole green pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 40 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type cooked, whole green pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 74 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type fermented, whole green pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 80 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type roasted, whole green pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 62 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type raw, whole lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 50 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type cooked, whole lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 70 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type fermented, whole lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 76 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type roasted, whole lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 63 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sugar, 5g gluten, 5mL malt solution, 4g nonfat dry milk, 3g shortening, 1.8g yeast, 1.5g salt |
Reference Baik and Han (2012) |
Pulse Type raw, chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 61 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 61.1 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 61.6 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, red lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 58.7 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, red lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 58.8 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, red lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 57.4 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, faba bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 63.6 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, faba bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 64.7 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, faba bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 66.2 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 60.1 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 60.2 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, bean |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 60.1 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 35-50g rye flour, 2g salt, 1.4g yeast |
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 7.2 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g yeast, 2g salt |
Reference Dabija et al. (2017) |
Pulse Type raw, yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 57.7 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g yeast, 2g salt |
Reference Dabija et al. (2017) |
Pulse Type raw, yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 58.3 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g yeast, 2g salt |
Reference Dabija et al. (2017) |
Pulse Type raw, yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) 58.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g yeast, 2g salt |
Reference Dabija et al. (2017) |
Pulse Type raw, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) ns |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 4g gluten, 4g yeast, 4g sugar, 4g shortening, 2g salt, 2g skim milk powder, 2g dough conditioner |
Reference Fahmi et al. (2019) |
Pulse Type steam roasted, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) ns |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 4g gluten, 4g yeast, 4g sugar, 4g shortening, 2g salt, 2g skim milk powder, 2g dough conditioner |
Reference Fahmi et al. (2019) |
Pulse Type raw, dehulled green lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 16 |
Water Addition (%) ns |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) olive oil, yeast, garlic powder, salt, pepper, herb mix |
Reference Fujiwara et al. (2017) |
Pulse Type raw, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 60.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g salt, 1g yeast |
Reference Kotsiou et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 61 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g salt, 1g yeast |
Reference Kotsiou et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 61.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g salt, 1g yeast |
Reference Kotsiou et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) |
Water Addition (%) |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g salt, 1g yeast |
Reference Kotsiou et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) 62.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g salt, 1g yeast |
Reference Kotsiou et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 59.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g salt, 1.5g yeast, 1g dough improver, 1g unsalted butter |
Reference Millar er al. (2019) |
Pulse Type germinated, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 58 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g salt, 1.5g yeast, 1g dough improver, 1g unsalted butter |
Reference Millar er al. (2019) |
Pulse Type dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 63 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 2g salt, 1.5g yeast, 1g dough improver, 1g unsalted butter |
Reference Millar er al. (2019) |
Pulse Type raw, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 59.9 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 3g yeast, 1.2g salt, 1g sugar |
Reference Mohammed et al. (2014) |
Pulse Type |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) 61 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 3g yeast, 1.2g salt, 1g sugar |
Reference Mohammed et al. (2014) |
Pulse Type raw, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 62.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 3g yeast, 1.2g salt, 1g sugar |
Reference Mohammed et al. (2014) |
Pulse Type raw, whole white lupin |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) 67.6 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 0-5g gluten, 3.6g yeast, 1g salt, 1g sugar, 1g vegetable fat |
Reference Pleming et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole white lupin |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) 72.4 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 0-5g gluten, 3.6g yeast, 1g salt, 1g sugar, 1g vegetable fat |
Reference Pleming et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole white lupin |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 10 |
Water Addition (%) 60 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 4.5g salt, 3g yeast |
Reference Plustea et al. (2022) |
Pulse Type raw, whole white lupin |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) 64.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 4.5g salt, 3g yeast |
Reference Plustea et al. (2022) |
Pulse Type raw, whole white lupin |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 30 |
Water Addition (%) 62.2 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 4.5g salt, 3g yeast |
Reference Plustea et al. (2022) |
Pulse Type raw, whole yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) Ns |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6.5g yeast, 2g gluten, 1.5g salt, 1g canola oil, 1g dough conditioner, 0.5g sugar |
Reference Young et al. (2020) |
Pulse Type dry roasted, whole yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) Ns |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6.5g yeast, 2g gluten, 1.5g salt, 1g canola oil, 1g dough conditioner, 0.5g sugar |
Reference Young et al. (2020) |
Pulse Type steam roasted, whole yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 20 |
Water Addition (%) ns |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6.5g yeast, 2g gluten, 1.5g salt, 1g canola oil, 1g dough conditioner, 0.5g sugar |
Reference Young et al. (2020) |
Pulse Type raw, whole yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 75 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 72.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole yellow pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 25 |
Water Addition (%) 70 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole green pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 75 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole green pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 72.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole green pea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 25 |
Water Addition (%) 70 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole red lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 75 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole red lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 73.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole red lentil |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 25 |
Water Addition (%) 72 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 5 |
Water Addition (%) 75 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 15 |
Water Addition (%) 72.5 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Pulse Type raw, whole chickpea |
Pulse Inclusion (%flour) 25 |
Water Addition (%) 68 |
Additional Ingredients (per 100g flour) 6g sucrose, 3g shortening, 2g yeast, 1.5g salt, 0.2g malt flour |
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
Ns = not specified
Raw Pulse Flours
Where raw pulse flours are being used, substitution rates of 5-10% have been reported to produce breads with comparable quality and minimal-to-no differences in dough handling and final bread sensory and textural quality compared to 100% wheat-based formulations (Autdorei et al., 2021; Bojnanska et al., 2021; Dabija et al., 2017; Kotsiou et al., 2021; Mohammed et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2021). At higher inclusion levels (≥15%), studies note a reduction in dough handling properties, loaf volume and the detection of pulse-related flavours and aromas.
Thermally Treated Pulse Flours
It is worth noting that much of the undesirable effects on final product quality have been alleviated through the use of thermally treated pulse flours; a common commercial technique used for its de-flavouring ability. For example, Millar et al. (2019) reported the dough handling properties of 30% dry roasted, dehulled yellow pea flour to be superior to those of raw and germinated flours resulting in breads with loaf volumes and densities comparable to the 100% wheat control. A similar study found that heat treatment minimized the negative sensory effects typically imparted by yellow pea on the colour, aroma and flavour of breads with minimal differences in end-product quality even when different roasting process conditions were applied (heating equipment, temperature, and steam) (Young et al., 2020). Other techniques used to improve the overall quality of pulse-containing breads include adjustments to the baking process and the addition of gluten and/or dough conditioners and improvers.
Protein Content Relative to 100% Wheat Control
Fibre Content Relative to 100% Wheat Control
Glycemic Index (GI) of Focaccia Bread
- Control
- 16% Dehulled, Green Lentil
Figure 3: Change in Glycemix Index after reformulation with lentil flour. Data adapted from Fujiwara et al., 2017
Application: Biscuits

Biscuits reformulated with pulse flours at substitution rates up to 20% have resulted in products with 22% higher protein and 950% higher fibre levels relative to control formulations (Figure 4, 5).
Example Formulation: Chickpea/Faba Bean Flour (3 - 12%)
Adapted from Rababeh et al., 2016
Water | Sugar | Shortening | Sodium Bicarbonate | Salt | Lecithin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
48 grams | 34 grams | 28 grams | 1.12 grams | 0.93 grams | 0.5 grams |
Water | Sugar | Shortening | Sodium Bicarbonate | Salt | Lecithin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
48 grams | 34 grams | 28 grams | 1.12 grams | 0.93 grams | 0.5 grams |
Example Formulation: Pea Flour (5 - 20%)
Adapted from Qayyum et al., 2017
Water | Sugar | Shortening | Egg | Milk | Vanilla Extract |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
59 - 61 grams | 40 grams | 55 grams | 10 grams | 4 mL |
Water | Sugar | Shortening | Egg | Milk | Vanilla Extract |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
59 - 61 grams | 40 grams | 55 grams | 10 grams | 4 mL |
Protein Content Relative to Control
Fibre Content Relative to Control
Application: Breads and Rolls


Research conducted by Kohajdove et al. (2013) reformulated baked rolls using 10-30% lentil and small white bean flour. The addition of pulse flour increased farinograph water absorption level and dough development time but resulted in decreased dough stability. Physical parameters were negatively affected, including decreases in volume, specific volume, and cambering. The highest acceptability and physical parameters values were achieved using a 10% pulse blend. Alternatively, Muldabekove et al. (2022) evaluated the use of dry sugar beet powder, chickpea and mung bean flour to replace refined sugar in buns. Successful formulations were obtained using 10% chickpea, 5% mung bean and 9% dry sugar beet powder, where the addition of pulse flours resulted in an overall 9-30% reduction in overall bun processing time due to its effect on dough preparation and baking.
Example Bun Formulation With Pulse Flours
Wheat Flour, 10% Chickpea Flour, 5% Mung Bean Flour
Adapted from Muldabekove et al. (2022)
Flour | Milk | Egg | Butter | Dry Sugar Beet Powder | Yeast |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 grams | 46 mL | 15 grams | 15 grams | 9.23 grams | 1.85 grams |
Flour | Milk | Egg | Butter | Dry Sugar Beet Powder | Yeast |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 grams | 46 mL | 15 grams | 15 grams | 9.23 grams | 1.85 grams |
Application: Cakes

The addition of pulse flours to sponge and layer cake formulations can improve nutritional and structural properties, with limited detectable differences in sensory characteristics, depending on pulse type and batter mixing method.

Gomez et al. (2012) successfully substituted up to 50% of wheat flour in sponge cake and 25% in layer cake with yellow pea flour while maintaining similar specific volume and firmness to the control and minimal differences in sensory quality (Figure 6, 7 below). Layer cakes were found to be more sensitive to detectable differences in sensory characteristics as a result of pea flour inclusion. Gallego et al. (2022) substituted 50% of wheat with chickpea flour in layer cake formulations and was able to obtain similar specific volume and hardness to the control with only minor decreases in the overall acceptability as determined by a 100-person volunteer consumer panel.
In a specific investigation on off-odour development in cakes, Krause et al. (2022) replaced 25% wheat flour in sponge cake formulations with chickpea, green lentil, lupin, green pea and yellow pea flours. The reformulated cakes produced desirable nutritional and structural properties, where odour profiles of cakes were influenced by pulse type and the batter mixing stage; the latter directly related to catalyzing lipid oxidation reactions associated with beany and bitter notes. The same research group later identified batter mixing to be a significant control step in the odour profile of resulting cakes. Interestingly, the addition of most pulse flours to sponge cakes resulted in an increased volume that was attributed to the high protein content and accompanying emulsifying properties which are important in cake batter structure development.
Layer Cake With Chickpea Flour
Adapted from Gallego et al. 2022
Flour (50% Chickpea Flour) | Sugar | Whole Milk | Liquid Pasteurized Egg | Sunflower Oil | Baking Powder |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
350 grams | 315 grams | 210 grams | 105 grams | 205 grams | 10.5 grams |
Flour (50% Chickpea Flour) | Sugar | Whole Milk | Liquid Pasteurized Egg | Sunflower Oil | Baking Powder |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
350 grams | 315 grams | 210 grams | 105 grams | 205 grams | 10.5 grams |
Layer Cake With Pea Flour
Adapted from Gomez et al. 2012
Flour (25-50% Pea Flour) | Sugar | Milk | Liquid Pasteurized Egg | Sunflower Oil | Baking Powder |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
350 grams | 315 grams | 210 grams | 175 grams | 105 grams | 10.5 grams |
Flour (25-50% Pea Flour) | Sugar | Milk | Liquid Pasteurized Egg | Sunflower Oil | Baking Powder |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
350 grams | 315 grams | 210 grams | 175 grams | 105 grams | 10.5 grams |
Sponge Cake With Pea Flour
Adapted from Gomez et al. 2012
Flour (25-50% Pea Flour) | Sugar | Liquid Pasteurized Egg | Water | Whipping Aid Agent | Powdered Milk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
245 grams | 240.5 grams | 344 grams | 55 grams | 14 grams | 25 grams |
Flour (25-50% Pea Flour) | Sugar | Liquid Pasteurized Egg | Water | Whipping Aid Agent | Powdered Milk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
245 grams | 240.5 grams | 344 grams | 55 grams | 14 grams | 25 grams |
Sponge Cake With Lentil, Lupin, Chickpea or Pea Flour
Adapted from Krause et al. 2022
Flour (25% Pulse Flour) | Sucrose | Eggs | Sunflower Oil |
---|---|---|---|
630 grams | 25% | 45% | 5% |
Flour (25% Pulse Flour) | Sucrose | Eggs | Sunflower Oil |
---|---|---|---|
630 grams | 25% | 45% | 5% |
Sponge Cake Sensory Analysis
- Control
- 25% Starch-Rich Pea Flour
- 25% Pea Flour
- 50% Starch-Rich Pea Flour
- 50% Pea Flour
Figure 6: Sensory analysis of sponge cake formulated with pea ingredients (Gomez et al., 2012)
Layer Cake Sensory Analysis
- Control
- 25% Starch-Rich Pea Flour
- 25% Pea Flour
Figure 7: Sensory analysis of layer cake formulated with pea flour ingredients. Data adapted from Gomez et al. (2012). Values with different letters are significantly different from one another p<0.05. Scales values range from 1= dislike extremely, 9= like extremely
Application: Cookies & Wafers


Pulse flours have been incorporated at up to 50% substitution rates in cookie and wafer formulations with significant improvements to the nutritional profile (Figure 8, 9). Pulse flour type, inclusion and particle size have all been reported to significantly affect quality attributes such as cookie weight, thickness, width, and hardness (Zucco et al. 2011). While the inclusion of pulse flours typically resulted in increased cookie hardness and height with a reduction in the spread, coarse pulse flours (90% of particles below 415-440 mm) were reported to have opposite effects on weight and thickness, producing softer cookies with greater spread than control formulations. (Figure 10)
Example Cookie and Wafer Formulations with Pulse Flours
Pulse Type | Inclusion Rate | Other Ingredients per 100g Flour | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Pulse Type Dehulled green lentil |
Inclusion Rate 11% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour Pastry flour, butter, salt, sugar, dehulled yellow pea flour, pea protein concentrate, vanilla, cocoa powder, baking powder |
Reference Fujiwara et al. (2017) |
Pulse Type Germinated kidney bean and chickpea blend |
Inclusion Rate 50% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 50g shortening, 40g sugar, 20g skim milk powder, 20mL water 1g sodium bicarbonate, 1g salt |
Reference Sibian and Riar (2020) |
Pulse Type Whole chickpea |
Inclusion Rate 25% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 50g sugar, 50g white butter, 1.4g ammonium bicarbonate |
Reference Thongram et al. (2016) |
Pulse Type Whole mung bean |
Inclusion Rate 25% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 50g sugar, 50g white butter, 1.4g ammonium bicarbonate |
Reference Thongram et al. (2016) |
Pulse Type Bean |
Inclusion Rate 20% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 182g water, 1g hydrogenated vegetable fat, 0.5g lecithin, 0,5% sodium bicarbonate |
Reference Tufan et al. (2019) |
Pulse Type Chickpea |
Inclusion Rate 20% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 182g water, 1g hydrogenated vegetable fat, 0.5g lecithin, 0,5% sodium bicarbonate |
Reference Tufan et al. (2019) |
Pulse Type Lentil |
Inclusion Rate 20% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 182g water, 1g hydrogenated vegetable fat, 0.5g lecithin, 0,5% sodium bicarbonate |
Reference Tufan et al. (2019) |
Pulse Type Dehulled green lentil |
Inclusion Rate 25-100% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 58g sugar, 29g shortening, 17.8g skim milk solution, 14g water, 1.1g sodium bicarbonate, 0.9g salt |
Reference Zucco et al. (2011) |
Pulse Type Whole navy bean |
Inclusion Rate 25-100% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 58g sugar, 29g shortening, 17.8g skim milk solution, 14g water, 1.1g sodium bicarbonate, 0.9g salt |
Reference Zucco et al. (2011) |
Pulse Type Whole pinto bean |
Inclusion Rate 25-100% |
Other Ingredients per 100g Flour 58g sugar, 29g shortening, 17.8g skim milk solution, 14g water, 1.1g sodium bicarbonate, 0.9g salt |
Reference Zucco et al. (2011) |
Protein Content Relative to Control
Figure 8: % Increase in protein content in cookie/wafers formulated with pulse flours
a) Fujiwara et al., 2017; b) Tufan et al., 2019; c) Thongram et al., 2016; d) Zucco et al. 2011; e) Sibian and Riar 2020
Fibre Content Relative to Control
Figure 9: % Increase in fibre in cookie/wafers formulated with pulse flours
a) Fujiwara et al., 2017; b) Tufan et al., 2019; c) Thongram et al., 2016; d) Sibian and Riar 2020
Texture (Peak Force - N)
- Coarse (d90: 415-440 um)
- Fine (d90: < 50 um)
- Control
Figure 10: Texture analysis of cookies formulated with pulse flours milled to coarse and fine granulations, adapted from Zucco et al. (2011)
Application Flat Breads, Pitas & Tortillas

Research conducted at the University of Manitoba evaluated the application of coarsely and finely ground dehulled green lentil, navy and pinto bean flours at rates of 25-100% in pita bread (Borsuk et al., 2012). Even at 100% inclusion, pulse formulations successfully formed pockets and were deemed suitable for pita processing.

At 25% inclusion, navy bean and pinto bean flours performed as well as or superior to the control based on the physical, textural, colour and sensory properties of the final product (Figure 11).
A later study evaluated the use of raw, infrared heated and roasted whole yellow pea, navy bean and faba beans flours in tortilla and pita applications (Frohlich et al., 2021). The heat treatments applied had minimal effects on end-product quality and were successfully able to reduce bitter and beany flavours commonly associated with pulses (Figure 12). This resulted in a higher purchasing intent for tortillas and pitas produced from infrared-heated pea and navy beans when evaluated by a consumer panel composed of 80 panellists.
Example Tortilla Formulation
Adapted from Frohlich et al. 2021
Ingredient | Amount |
---|---|
Flour Blend | 100 grams |
Canola Oil | 10 grams |
Salt | 1.5 grams |
Baking Powder | 15 grams |
Dry Yeast | 1 gram |
Sugar | 0.5 grams |
Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate | 0.375 grams |
Monoglyceride | 0.375 grams |
Calcium Propionate | 0.375 grams |
Fumaric Acid | 0.375 grams |
Ingredient | Amount |
---|---|
Flour Blend | 100 grams |
Canola Oil | 10 grams |
Salt | 1.5 grams |
Baking Powder | 15 grams |
Dry Yeast | 1 gram |
Sugar | 0.5 grams |
Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate | 0.375 grams |
Monoglyceride | 0.375 grams |
Calcium Propionate | 0.375 grams |
Fumaric Acid | 0.375 grams |
Example Pita Formulation
Adapted from Frohlich et al. 2021
Flour Blend | Salt | Compressed Yeast | Calcium Propionate |
---|---|---|---|
100 grams | 1 gram | 1 gram | 0.375 grams |
Flour Blend | Salt | Compressed Yeast | Calcium Propionate |
---|---|---|---|
100 grams | 1 gram | 1 gram | 0.375 grams |
Adapted from Borsuk et al. 2012
Flour Blend | Salt | Active Dry Yeast | Gum Mix* |
---|---|---|---|
100 grams | 1.5 grams | 1.0 grams | 0.4 grams |
Flour Blend | Salt | Active Dry Yeast | Gum Mix* |
---|---|---|---|
100 grams | 1.5 grams | 1.0 grams | 0.4 grams |
*Mixture of cellulose, guar and xanthan gum
Mean Sensory Scores for Pitas
- Control
- 25% Navy Bean
- 25% Pinto Bean
- 100% Navy Bean
Figure 11: Data adapted from Borsuk et al. (2012) as evaluated by 80 consumer panelists on a nine-point scale from 1= dislike extremely to 9 = like extremely. Means with different letter designations are statistically (p<0.05) different from one another.
Application: Sourdough Bread

Pulse flours have been incorporated into sourdough bread both directly into the fermented starter culture or as an additional ingredient to the bread formulation during dough mixing. Research by Rizello et al. (2014) evaluated both methods of preparation using a 15% blend of chickpea, lentil and bean flours at equal ratios. Authors reported improvements to the overall nutritional profile of the bread including an increase in protein, crude fibre, total free amino acids and antioxidant activity relative to the wheat-based, yeast-leavened control bread (Figure 14, 15, 16). Texture, image and sensory evaluation of all sourdoughs displayed good acceptability, with the fermented wheat/pulse blend starter culture exhibiting minimal differences in quality compared to the control.
A similar study evaluating the incorporation of 30% raw and fermented, dehulled faba bean flours did not note any severe negative effects of its inclusion on the technological performance of sourdough breads other than a reduction in loaf volume (Coda et al., 2017). However, fermenting faba-wheat blends as part of the starter culture resulted in sourdough breads with significantly higher in vitro protein digestibility, protein efficiency ratio and a reduced predicted glycemic index (Figure 13). Bourre et al. (2019) identified the most acceptable flavour and quality characteristics in breads produced with a 25% inclusion of sourdough culture that had been fermented for 1hr. Interestingly, the evaluation of the fermented and subsequently frozen sourdough culture containing 25 and 50% chickpea flour found that chickpea addition significantly decreased the percentage of freezable water content in the dough (Figure 17) (Ozulku et al., 2017). This limited destruction of the gluten network and the injuring of yeast cells as a result of ice crystal formation, resulting in improved texture after freezing. The benefit of this was demonstrated after baking the frozen doughs, in which the volume of control sourdough formulations decreased by 17% after freezing, where no significant changes occurred in chickpea-containing breads (Figure 18). Further research is warranted to elucidate the effects of pulse flour inclusion on quality retention in frozen doughs.
In Vitro Protein Digestibility (IVPD), Protein Efficiency Ration (PER) and Predicted Glycemic Index (pGI) of Sourdough Breads
- Control
- 30% Raw Faba Bean
- 30% Fermented Faba Bean
Figure 13 In Vitro Protein Digestibility (IVPD), Protein Efficiency Ration (PER) and Predicted Glycemic Index (pGI) of Sourdough Breads
Protein Content Relative to Control
Figure 14: % Increase in protein content in sourdough formulated with chickpea, lentil and/or bean
Fibre Content Relative to Control
Figure 15: % Increase in fibre content in sourdough formulated with raw and fermented chickpea, lentil and bean flours
Free Amino Acid Relative to Control
Figure 16: % Increase in free amino acid content in sourdough formulated with chickpea, lentil and/or bean flours
Freezable Water Content of Sourdough Bread (%)
Figure 17: Changes in freezable water content in sourdough formulated with chickpea flour
Volume of Sourdough Bread (mL)
- Unfrozen
- Frozen
Figure 18: Impact of freezing on bread volume in sourdough reformulated with chickpea flour, Data adapted from Ozulku et al., 2017
Application: Gluten-Free Bread


Boulemkahel et al. (2022) evaluated the use of ~33% faba bean flour in the development of additive-free and gluten-free breads in combination with raw and low-pressure homogenized long and medium-grained rice varieties. Homogenization treatment of rice flours resulted in improved bread texture characteristics including decreased hardness and increased cohesiveness, resilience, crumb structure and shape. Another study evaluated the use of 50% raw or fermented faba bean flour in corn starch-based breads (Sozer et al. 2019).
Regardless of pre-treatment, the inclusion of faba bean flour resulted in greater bread volume, porosity and softer texture relative to the 37% soy flour control formulations. In addition, fermentation of faba beans increased the in vitro protein digestibility of the gluten-free breads (Figure 19). Santos et al. (2018) evaluated chickpea flour alone or in combination with cassava starch, maize starch, potato starch and rice flour in the development of gluten-free bread.
Formulations containing solely 100% chickpea flour alone had the highest volume, crumb firmness and lowest crumb moisture compared to breads containing any other single base ingredient. However, loaf volumes of chickpea flour-based breads were positively influenced by the inclusion of either 25% potato or cassava starches. These breads displayed similar overall acceptability scores to wheat-only controls and superior nutrition to a white, gluten-free bread control formulated from rice and potato starch.
Example Formulation: Chickpea/Cassava Starch Bread
Adapted from Santos et al., 2018
Ingredient | Amount |
---|---|
Flour/Starch Blend | 100 grams |
Water | 100 grams |
Whole Egg | 25 grams |
Whole Milk Powder | 10.5 grams |
Sugar | 6 grams |
Soy Oil | 6 grams |
Salt | 2 grams |
Yeast | 0.8 grams |
Xanthan Gum | 0.3 grams |
Carboxymethylcellulose | 0.3 grams |
Ingredient | Amount |
---|---|
Flour/Starch Blend | 100 grams |
Water | 100 grams |
Whole Egg | 25 grams |
Whole Milk Powder | 10.5 grams |
Sugar | 6 grams |
Soy Oil | 6 grams |
Salt | 2 grams |
Yeast | 0.8 grams |
Xanthan Gum | 0.3 grams |
Carboxymethylcellulose | 0.3 grams |
Example Formulation: Rice/Faba Bean Bread
Adapted from Boulemkahel et al., 2022
Flour (2:1 blend of rice:faba bean) | Yeast | Salt | Fungal Alpha-Amylase |
---|---|---|---|
100 grams | 2 grams | 1.5 grams | 0.001 grams |
Flour (2:1 blend of rice:faba bean) | Yeast | Salt | Fungal Alpha-Amylase |
---|---|---|---|
100 grams | 2 grams | 1.5 grams | 0.001 grams |
Example Formulation: Faba Bean Bread
Adapted from Sozer et al. 2019
Ingredient | Amount |
---|---|
Faba Bean Flour | 50 grams |
Corn Starch | 50 grams |
Water | 102.6 grams |
Sugar | 5.7 grams |
Shortening | 4.9 grams |
Yeast | 4.9 grams |
Baking Powder | 2.4 grams |
Xanthan Gum | 2 grams |
Salt | 1.7 grams |
Emulsifier | 0.6 grams |
Ingredient | Amount |
---|---|
Faba Bean Flour | 50 grams |
Corn Starch | 50 grams |
Water | 102.6 grams |
Sugar | 5.7 grams |
Shortening | 4.9 grams |
Yeast | 4.9 grams |
Baking Powder | 2.4 grams |
Xanthan Gum | 2 grams |
Salt | 1.7 grams |
Emulsifier | 0.6 grams |
In Vitro Protein Digestibility (%) of Corn Starch Based Gluten-free Breads
- 37% Soy Flour
- 50% Raw Faba Bean Flour
- 50% Fermented Faba Bean Flour
Figure 19: Data from Sozer et al. 2019
Protein and Dietary Fibre Content of Bread
- 100% Chickpea
- 75% Chickpea, 25% Potato Starch
- 75% Chickpea, 25% Cassava Starch
- Gluten-free, White
- Wheat Control 1
- Wheat Control 2
Figure 20: Data adapted from Santos et al. 2018
Application: Gluten-Free Biscuits

Wesley et al. (2021) evaluated gluten-free biscuits produced with various flour blends using raw and cooked white bean flour in combination with brown, polished, and cooked polished rice. At least two of the rice/bean biscuits developed displayed similar physicochemical properties to the whole wheat flour control. Cooking the bean flour was found to improve the nutritional profile closer to that of the wheat control with higher overall acceptance. The highest acceptability score and purchasing intent by consumers was found for biscuits formulated with a blend of cooked bean flour, brown rice and polished rice flour (Figure 21).
Example Formulations: Rice-Based Biscuits With Pulse Flours
Adapted from Benkadri et al. 2018
Rice Flour | Chickpea Flour | Water | Sugar | Hydrogenated Vegetable Fat | Xanthan Gum | Ammonium Bicarbonate | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21.9 g | 78.1 g | 33 g | 18.1 g | 13.36 g | 0 - 1.5 g | 0.9 g | 0.75 g |
Rice Flour | Chickpea Flour | Water | Sugar | Hydrogenated Vegetable Fat | Xanthan Gum | Ammonium Bicarbonate | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21.9 g | 78.1 g | 33 g | 18.1 g | 13.36 g | 0 - 1.5 g | 0.9 g | 0.75 g |
Other Ingredients: 0.5 g sodium bicarbonate
Adapted from Wesley et al., 2021
Brown Rice Flour | Polished Rice Flour | Cooked Bean Flour | Water | Flaxseed | Extra Virgin Olive Oil | Baking Soda | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
37.3 g | 37.3 g | 35 g | 41 g | 11 g | 3 g | 3 g | 2.4 g |
Brown Rice Flour | Polished Rice Flour | Cooked Bean Flour | Water | Flaxseed | Extra Virgin Olive Oil | Baking Soda | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
37.3 g | 37.3 g | 35 g | 41 g | 11 g | 3 g | 3 g | 2.4 g |
Other Ingredients: 2 g xantham gum, 1.5 g dehydrated onion
Mean Sensory Scores of Gluten-free Biscuits
- Whole Wheat Control
- 25% Raw, White Bean in BRF
- 32% Cooked, White Bean in PRF
- 32% Cooked, White Bean in BRF-PRF
- 20% Raw, White Bean in BRF:CPR
- 26% Cooked, White Bean in BRF:CPR
Figure 21: Data adapted from Wesley et al. (2021)
Application: Gluten-Free Cookies

Schmelter et al. (2021) evaluated six faba bean varieties in the production of gluten-free cookies. No differences in baking loss or volume were noted. However, faba bean cookies had a harder texture than the wheat-only control. Because of the flavour notes and darker colour of faba bean cookies, authors suggested that acceptable products could be produced using dehulled faba bean flour with additional flavour- and colour-intense ingredients (eg. cocoa) which could mask the effects of faba bean inclusion. Hajas et al. (2022) evaluated five differently coloured lentils in cookies compared to a rice flour control formulation. Lentil cookies were generally flatter and firmer than their rice counterparts, with similar baking losses but increased protein, phenolic and flavonoid content as well as antioxidant properties. The textural differences between lentil and rice cookies were not detrimental and could serve as a promising flour in gluten-free baking as assessed by a 61-person sensory panel.
Example Formulations: Gluten-Free Cookies with Pulse Flours
Adapted from Schmelter et al. 2021
Whole Faba Bean Flour | Butter | Sugar | Water | Egg Powder | Baking Powder | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 50 g | 40 g | 17.7 g | 5.9 g | 1 g | 0.6 g |
Whole Faba Bean Flour | Butter | Sugar | Water | Egg Powder | Baking Powder | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 50 g | 40 g | 17.7 g | 5.9 g | 1 g | 0.6 g |
Adapted from Hajas et al. 2022
Lentil Flour | Sugar | 70% Fat Margarine | 5% Glucose Solution | Water | Sodium Bicarbonate | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 8 g | 28.4 g | 14.6 g | 7.11 g | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
Lentil Flour | Sugar | 70% Fat Margarine | 5% Glucose Solution | Water | Sodium Bicarbonate | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 8 g | 28.4 g | 14.6 g | 7.11 g | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
Application: Gluten-Free Flat Breads & Tortillas

A study evaluated the use of extruded chickpea flours at a 30% inclusion rate in nixtamalized maize tortillas (Bon-Padilla et al., 2022). Extrusion settings were optimized to produce the most functional flour using an extrusion temperature of 143oC and screw speed of 138 rpm. Authors reported that the addition of extruded chickpea flour improved the sensory acceptability, nutritional and anti-hypertensive properties of the tortillas (Figure 22, 23). Another study evaluated chickpea/barley flour mixtures in the production of flatbreads where incorporation of up to 30% chickpea flour improved texture without significantly affecting the most sensory attributes of flatbreads (Mansoor et al., 2021).
Example Formulation: Chickpea-Barley Flatbread
Adapted from Mansoor et al. 2021
70% Chickpea/ 30% Barley Flour Mi | Corn Oil | Red Chili | Salt |
---|---|---|---|
100 g | 10 g | 5 g | 2 g |
70% Chickpea/ 30% Barley Flour Mi | Corn Oil | Red Chili | Salt |
---|---|---|---|
100 g | 10 g | 5 g | 2 g |
Protein and Fibre Content of Corn Tortillas
- Control
- 30% Extruded Chickpea Flour
Figure 22: Protein & fibre content of corn tortillas formulated with 30% chickpea flour
Calculated Protein Efficiency Ratio and Anti-hypertensive Potential of Corn Tortillas
- Control
- 30% Extruded Chickpea
Figure 23: PER and anti-hypertensive potential of corn tortillas formulated with 30% chickpea flour
In Vitro Protein Digestibility (%)
Figure 24: Protein digestibility of corn tortillas formulated with 30% chickpea flour, Data from Bon-Padilla et al. (2022)
Application: Gluten-Free Muffins

A study by Jeong et al. (2021) evaluated a combination of heat-treated mung bean and cowpea flours blended with waxy rice flour to produce gluten-free muffins. The addition of pulse flours lowered the specific volume with increased final product hardness (most prominent at the 80% inclusion level) however, did improve the overall nutritional profile of muffins, particularly through increases in total protein content (Figure 25). Optimal physical, texture, and sensory appearance were obtained using a 1:1 pulse-rice flour blend, where sensory properties were nearly identical to those of 100% wheat-only control muffins.
Example Formulation: Gluten-Free Muffins with Mung bean and Cowpea Flours
Adapted from Jeong et al. 2021
Pulse/Waxy Rice Flour Blend | Sugar | Butter | Baking Powder | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 60 g | 40 g | 3 g | 1 g |
Pulse/Waxy Rice Flour Blend | Sugar | Butter | Baking Powder | Salt |
---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 60 g | 40 g | 3 g | 1 g |
Protein Content Relative to the Control
Figure 25: % Increase in protein relative to control. Data adapted from Jeong et al. (2021)
Application: Gluten-Free Crackers

Han et al. (2010) evaluated the use of multiple pulse flours (including desi chickpea, green lentil, red lentil, pinto bean, navy bean, and yellow pea) and yellow pea fractions to produce gluten-free cracker formulations. Crackers made in one and four-dot moulds scored well on the consumer sensory acceptance test with similar physical properties compared to commercial control crackers. Chickpea crackers were successfully scaled up in a commercial trial, containing 3-6 times more of the iron daily recommended value with otherwise similar nutritional properties to existing crackers in the marketplace. Another study successfully incorporated up to 40% chickpea flour in corn and potato flour-based cracker formulations (Kamel et al., 2020). The addition of chickpea flour increased the protein content and enhanced the amino acid profile. The sensory properties of the crackers were well received by panellists.
Example Formulations: Gluten-Free Crackers with Pulse Flours
Adapted from Kamel et al. 2020
Corn/Potato/ Chickpea Flour Blend | Fat | Salt | Seasoning | Lecithin | Xanthan Gum | Sodium Bicarbonate | Sodium Metabisulphite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 25 g | 2.5 g | Cumin - 1.9 g; Anise - 1.9 g; Black Pepper Seed - 1.3 g | 1.3 g | 0.9 g | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
Corn/Potato/ Chickpea Flour Blend | Fat | Salt | Seasoning | Lecithin | Xanthan Gum | Sodium Bicarbonate | Sodium Metabisulphite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 25 g | 2.5 g | Cumin - 1.9 g; Anise - 1.9 g; Black Pepper Seed - 1.3 g | 1.3 g | 0.9 g | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
Adapted from Han et al. 2010
Pulse Flour | Water | Oil | Salt | Chemical Leavening Agent | Hydrocolloid Gum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 27 - 33 g | 20 - 27 g | 3 - 4 g | 0.6 - 0.8 g | 0.6 - 0.8 g |
Pulse Flour | Water | Oil | Salt | Chemical Leavening Agent | Hydrocolloid Gum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 g | 27 - 33 g | 20 - 27 g | 3 - 4 g | 0.6 - 0.8 g | 0.6 - 0.8 g |
Nutritional Composition of Gluten-Free Crackers
Nutritional composition of the gluten-free cracker produced from the commercial-scale processing trial (Sample name: four-dot mould-shaped cracker).
Adapted from Han et al. (2010)
Component | Method | Concentration | Unit |
---|---|---|---|
Calories | Calculate | 445.58 | Per 100 g |
Fat, Total | AOAC Solvent Extraction | 13.30 | % |
Saturated Fatty Acids | AOAC 996.06 | 1.18 | % |
Trans-Fatty Acids | AOAC 996.06 | 0.00 | % |
Monounsaturated Fatty Acids | AOAC 996.06 | 9.42 | % |
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids | AOAC 996.06 | 3.12 | % |
Cholesterol | AOAC 996.06 | 1.53 | mg/100 g |
Total Carbohydrate | Calculate | 70.79 | % |
Total Dietary Fibre | AOAC 992.16/985.29 | 5.40 | % |
Sugars | HPLC-RI | 6.02 | % |
Protein | AOAC 981.10/993.13 | 10.68 | % |
Sodium | ICP-MS | 1140 | mg/100 g |
Iron | ICP-MS | 2.80 | mg/100 g |
Moisture | Oven-drying at 105 C | 0.86 | % |
Ash | AOAC 923.02 | 4.37 | % |
Omega 3 | GC-FID | 0.23 | % |
Omega 6 | GC-FID | 2.89 | % |
Omega 9 | GC-FID | 9.38 | % |
Component | Method | Concentration | Unit |
---|---|---|---|
Calories | Calculate | 445.58 | Per 100 g |
Fat, Total | AOAC Solvent Extraction | 13.30 | % |
Saturated Fatty Acids | AOAC 996.06 | 1.18 | % |
Trans-Fatty Acids | AOAC 996.06 | 0.00 | % |
Monounsaturated Fatty Acids | AOAC 996.06 | 9.42 | % |
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids | AOAC 996.06 | 3.12 | % |
Cholesterol | AOAC 996.06 | 1.53 | mg/100 g |
Total Carbohydrate | Calculate | 70.79 | % |
Total Dietary Fibre | AOAC 992.16/985.29 | 5.40 | % |
Sugars | HPLC-RI | 6.02 | % |
Protein | AOAC 981.10/993.13 | 10.68 | % |
Sodium | ICP-MS | 1140 | mg/100 g |
Iron | ICP-MS | 2.80 | mg/100 g |
Moisture | Oven-drying at 105 C | 0.86 | % |
Ash | AOAC 923.02 | 4.37 | % |
Omega 3 | GC-FID | 0.23 | % |
Omega 6 | GC-FID | 2.89 | % |
Omega 9 | GC-FID | 9.38 | % |
The Science

What are the effects of pulse inclusion on dough handling?
The high protein and fibre content of pulse flours will typically result in increased water absorption, often described as stickier doughs. The sticky doughs are accompanied by an increase in dough development time that is attributed to the interaction between pulse proteins and gluten which delays hydration and the gluten network development (Kohajdova et al. 2013). As a result, dough stability is often accordingly decreased. It has been suggested to alleviate the effects of pulse inclusion on dough stickiness, the optimal water inclusion level should be reduced (Aiken, 2016; Xing et al. 2021) or the inclusion level can be adjusted so that minimal effects on dough handling occur. For example, Bourre et al. (2019) reported that the addition of 10% roasted, split yellow pea flour did not affect dough rheology. The addition of dough strengtheners and conditioners such as vital wheat gluten and hydrocolloids are also commonly applied in commercial baking to improve the dough handling of pulse-containing products.
What are the effects of pulse inclusion on colour?
The addition of pulse flour into baked systems will typically result in a darker crumb colour as a result of Maillard and caramelization reactions during baking. The intrinsic colour of the pulse will also have an effect on the end product colour; where green pea flour may increase green hues or red lentil flour might increase red hues in the final product. Some pulse types, such as navy beans, have little colour pigmentation which results in smaller differences in the colour of baked products.
Colour
- Control
- 20% finely ground dehulled yellow pea
- 20% coarsely ground dehulled yellow pea
- 20% finely ground dehulled navy bean
- 20% coarsely ground dehulled navy bean
- 20% finely ground dehulled red lentil
- 20% coarsely ground dehulled red lentil
Figure 26: Effect of pulse flour inclusion on the Minolta Chroma meter colour measurements of bread. Adapted from Bourre et al. (2019)
What are the effects of pulse flour inclusion on final product flavour?
A large proportion of grassy, beany, and bitter off-flavours and aromas from pulses are the products of the enzymatic degradation of linoleic and linolenic acid by lipoxygenase that is initiated during harvest and transportation of the crop, further catalyzed as air is introduced during dough mixing (Krause et al, 2022b). Krause et al. evaluated the inclusion of yellow pea, green pea, chickpea, lentil and heat-treated lupin flour on the production of volatile compounds (VOCs) in cakes. The lipoxygenase activity of raw pulse flours ranged from 2510-4350 nkat/g resulting in significantly higher total VOC content for batters and cakes relative to the control. Interestingly, batters containing chickpea and lentil flours, displayed lower concentrations of total VOC content than batters containing yellow and green pea flour. This was attributed to the higher concentration of antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols in chickpeas and lentils that could serve to decelerate the oxidative reaction of lipoxygenase. The inactivation of lipoxygenase activity as a result of the heat treatment applied to lupin flour corresponded to minimal concentrations of VOC comparable to the control. Heat treatments that inactivate lipoxygenase activity are commonly applied by industry as a tool to produce flours with decreased intensity of off-flavours and aromas. Otherwise, careful selection of substitution rates and flavour masking ingredients (ex: cocoa) can be applied to minimize the influence of pulse flour ingredients in baked goods.
Total VOCs (ug/g sample) in Batter
Figure 27: Total concentration of volatile compounds in cake batter containing pulse flours. Data adapted from Krause et al. (2022b).
What is the effect of flour particle size on final product quality?
Particle size distribution is one of the most important parameters to consider when sourcing a pulse flour for baked goods as it significantly affects its processability and ease of handling. Finer ground flours display lower water absorption due to differences in the association between protein and starch and the degree of starch damage (Zucco et al., 2011). Fine flours are typically preferred as less water is required during mixing to sufficiently hydrate the protein network while still maintaining a machinable dough. Bourre et al. (2019) found that bread doughs produced using 10% finely ground pulse flours (90% of particles < 300 mm) displayed lower water absorption, higher pasting viscosity, as well as superior bread scores with a tighter crumb structure. In this study, particle size was not found to significantly influence bread volume or sensory characteristics. Gomez et al. (2022) reported that more evenly distributed particles were easier to include and produced a more cohesive dough in muffins containing 10% pea flour. Interestingly, cookies produced from 23-75% inclusion of coarse pulse flour (90% of particles <500 mm,) resulted in a softer texture with an increased spread ratio (Zucco et al., 2011). Differences in the particle size distribution based on the type of baked product evaluated emphasize the importance when sourcing pulse flours for baking.
Percent starch damage (A) and water absorption capacity (B) for pulse flours milled to different particle size distributions using various screen sizes. Crumb firmness (C) is reported for bread baked substituting 20% of wheat flour in the formulation; constant baking absorption levels were applied for loaves of bread within pulse market classes using optimized mix and proof times. Letter differences within a pulse market class indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between means. Data adapted from Bourre et al. (2019)
What is the effect of treatments on final product quality?
Additional processing may be applied to the pulse seed prior to milling or on the resulting flour to influence its composition, functionality and sensory properties. The most common commercially applied technique is the use of heat or steam to improve flavour and aroma. Kotsiou et al. (2021) reported that bread formulated with 10-20% roasted, split yellow pea flour effectively inhibited the beany and grass-like off-flavour notes present in raw pea flour formulations. At the 10% inclusion level, no differences were observed on dough rheological performance, bread texture and shelf life. Frolich et al. (2021) evaluated the effects of infrared heating and roasting on the resulting yellow pea, navy bean and faba bean flour performance when incorporated at a rate of 30% in pita and tortilla formulations. The applied treatments were responsible for a reduction in the seed moisture content that increased the level of starch damage that occurred during milling. As a result, thermally treated flour displayed increased water absorption capacities that were also attributed to the partial thermal denaturation of proteins. Infrared heat treatment was found to be most successful in the reduction of off-flavours for both pita and tortillas with the highest purchase intent scores after consumer sensory panels. Roasted pulse flours have also been reported to produce a darker crust colour in baked products than raw or alternative heat treatments.
What are the differences between pulse types?
Each pulse type is unique and thus differently affects the final product quality of baked goods, most notably are differences in composition and seed characteristics including size and colour. The table below highlights reported differences in product quality by pulse type:
Applications | Effect of Pulse Type | Reference |
---|---|---|
Applications Bread |
Effect of Pulse Type Common bean, chickpea, faba bean and red lentil:
|
Reference Bojnanska et al. (2021) |
Applications Pita Bread |
Effect of Pulse Type Green lentils, navy beans, and pinto beans:
|
Reference Borsuk et al. (2012) |
Applications Bread |
Effect of Pulse Type Yellow pea, navy bean, and red lentil:
|
Reference Bourre et al (2019) |
Applications Tortilla and Pitas |
Effect of Pulse Type Yellow pea, navy bean and faba bean:
|
Reference Frolich et al. (2021) |
Applications Sponge cake |
Effect of Pulse Type Lentil, chickpea, lupin, green pea and yellow pea:
|
Reference Krause et al. (2022) |
Applications Baked crackers |
Effect of Pulse Type Faba bean, yellow pea, and green pea:
|
Reference Millar et al. (2017) |
Applications Wafers |
Effect of Pulse Type Lentil, chickpea and common bean:
|
Reference Tufan et al. (2020) |
Applications Cookies |
Effect of Pulse Type Navy bean, pinto bean, green lentil and yellow pea:
|
Reference Zucco et al. (2011) |
Applications Bread |
Effect of Pulse Type Yellow pea, commercial yellow pea (smaller particle size) green pea, red lentil, and chickpea:
|
Reference Zhang et al. (2021) |
What are some processing strategies that can be used to improve final product quality?
Improvements in the nutritional profile of baked goods because of pulse flour addition often comes at the expense of final product quality. However, modifications to either the formulation and/or baking process have been studied for their effects on improving final product quality.
Effect of Baking Time
Millar et al. (2017) evaluated the effect of increasing the baking time at 175 oC from 21 to 31 min for crackers formulated with 40% faba bean, yellow pea, and green pea flours. Water activity of crackers baked at 21 minutes was significantly higher. At prolonged baking times, Maillard browning was responsible for intensifying colour deviations, where crackers displayed increased golden colour and red hues even when green pea flour was applied. The effect of baking time on cracker texture was dependent on pulse type, whereby faba bean crackers baked for 31 min and yellow pea crackers baked for 21 min were the hardest.
Effect of Mixing Time
Krause et al. (2022c) identified the duration of mixing after oil addition in sponge cake systems to have an influence on the potential development of volatile compounds associated with off-flavors and aromas in the final product. This was hypothesized to the be result of a prolonged point of contact between lipoxygenase with fatty acids that may facilitate their oxidation. The mixing time after the addition of oil was identified specifically due to its importance in creating a more uniformly distributed dough with smaller air bubbles and fat particles that results in larger surface areas for chemical reactions to occur. Extension of the mixing time after flour addition alone did not result in any significant changes in the primary or secondary metabolites of lipid oxidation and thus had no apparent effect on the concentration of volatile compounds.
Effect of Pre-Ferment and Vital Wheat Gluten Addition
Bread formulated with 20% lupin flour was produced using two baking systems in conjunction with 0-5% addition of vital gluten powder (Pleming et al., 2021). The first baking system evaluated represented a rapid process in which all ingredients were mixed with vital wheat gluten to produce a dough, then rested (20 min at 28 oC) moulded, proofed (45 min at 38oC, 85% RH) and baked for 12 minutes at 214 oC. The alternative baking system applied incorporated a sponge & dough process in which 70% of the water and flour were mixed with malt flour, calcium dihydrogen orthophosphate, ammonium sulphate, ascorbic acid and dry active yeast that was allowed to ferment for 45 min at 28 oC to produce a “sponge”. After fermentation, the sponge was mixed with remaining flour, water, vital wheat gluten, fat, sugar and salt before entering the same mixing, moulding, proofing and baking process as applied to the rapidly baked bread. The pre-ferment applied in the sponge and dough process allowed for more time for the lupin protein and fibre components to bind water, lessening the free water available in the system. As a result, the rate of staling for breads produced using the sponge and dough process was decreased, with further retarding upon the addition of vital wheat gluten. Vital wheat gluten addition was instrumental in improving the dough handling, bread loaf volume, and final crumb texture of breads formulated with lupin flour.
When vital wheat gluten cannot be used:
- The addition of xanthan gum to gluten-free, rice-chickpea biscuits has been reported to improve springiness, cohesiveness and adhesiveness with accompanying increases in hardness and elasticity (Bankadri et al.)
- The addition of proteases was successful in inhibiting the development of large protein aggregates responsible for disrupting the starch-gel structure that contributes to texture in gluten-free bread, ensuring a more cohesive and continuous dough structure with softer crumb (Renzetti et al., 2022)
- Microwave-infrared cooking as an alternative to conventional baking produced legume cakes with higher specific volume although greater weight loss and more profound crust colour changes (Ozkahraman et al., 2016).
The inclusion of dextrans in sprouted barley and lentil flour sourdough resulted in improved final product structure (Perri et al., 2021)
Sponge and dough percent optimal water absorption
- 0% Gluten
- 2% Gluten
- 3.5% Gluten
- 5% Gluten
Rapid percent optimal water absorption
- 0% Gluten
- 2% Gluten
- 3.5% Gluten
- 5% Gluten
Sponge and dough mixing time
- 0% Gluten
- 2% Gluten
- 3.5% Gluten
- 5% Gluten
Rapid mixing time
- 0% Gluten
- 2% Gluten
- 3.5% Gluten
- 5% Gluten
Sponge and dough bread volume
- 0% Gluten
- 2% Gluten
- 3.5% Gluten
- 5% Gluten
Rapid bread volume
- 0% Gluten
- 2% Gluten
- 3.5% Gluten
- 5% Gluten
Effect of lupin variety and gluten addition level on optimum water absorption level (top), dough mixing time (middle) and bread volume (bottom) for bread formulated with 20% lupin flour produced using the sponge and dough (left) or rapid (right) breadmaking process. Control is wheat-only bread, data adapted from Pleming et al. (2021).
References

Aiken, L. (2016, February 26). On the pulse. Bakers Journal.
Atudorei, D., Atudorei, O., & Codină, G. G. (2021). Dough Rheological Properties, Microstructure and Bread Quality of Wheat-Germinated Bean Composite Flour. Foods, 10(7), 1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071542
Baik, B.-K., & Han, I. H. (2012). Cooking, Roasting, and Fermentation of Chickpeas, Lentils, Peas, and Soybeans for Fortification of Leavened Bread. Cereal Chemistry Journal, 89(6), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-04-12-0047-R
Benkadri, S., Salvador, A., Zidoune, M. N., & Sanz, T. (2018). Gluten-free biscuits based on composite rice–chickpea flour and xanthan gum. Food Science and Technology International, 24(7), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013218779323
Bojňanská, T., Musilová, J., & Vollmannová, A. (2021). Effects of Adding Legume Flours on the Rheological and Breadmaking Properties of Dough. Foods, 10(5), 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051087
Bon-Padilla, B.K., Reyes-Moreno, C., Milan-Carrilo, J., Reynoso-Camacho, R., Gomez-Aldapa, C.A., Gomez-Favela, M.A. & Gutierrez-Dorado, R. (2022) Tortillas made from nixtamalized maize and extruded chickpea flour: a product with improved in vitro and nutritional and antihypertensive properties. Cereal Chemistry, 99, 1154-1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10577
Borsuk, Y., Arntfield, S., Lukow, O. M., Swallow, K., & Malcolmson, L. (2012). Incorporation of pulse flours of different particle size in relation to pita bread quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92(10), 2055–2061. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5581
Boulemkahel, S., Garzon, R., Benatallah, L., & Rosell, C. M. (2022). Development of gluten‐free bread using low‐pressure homogenized rice flour supplemented with faba bean flour. Cereal Chemistry, 99(2), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10498
Bourré, L., Frohlich, P., Young, G., Borsuk, Y., Sopiwnyk, E., Sarkar, A., Nickerson, M. T., Ai, Y., Dyck, A., & Malcolmson, L. (2019). Influence of particle size on flour and baking properties of yellow pea, navy bean, and red lentil flours. Cereal Chemistry, 96(4), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10161
Bourré, L., McMillin, K., Borsuk, Y., Boyd, L., Lagassé, S., Sopiwnyk, E., Jones, S., Dyck, A., & Malcolmson, L. (2019). Effect of adding fermented split yellow pea flour as a partial replacement of wheat flour in bread. Legume Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.2
Chaudhary, A., Marinangeli, C.P.F., Tremorin, D. & Mathys, A. (2018). Nutritional combined greenhouse gas life cycle analysis for incorporating Canadian yellow pea into cereal based food. Nutrients. 10, 490 doi:10.3390/nu10040490
Coda, R., Varis, J., Verni, M., Rizzello, C. G., & Katina, K. (2017). Improvement of the protein quality of wheat bread through faba bean sourdough addition. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 82, 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.04.062
Dabija, A., Codina, G. G., & Fradinho, P. (2017). Effects of yellow pea flour addition on wheat flour dough and bread quality . Romanian Biotechnological Letters , 22(5).
Fabek,H., Sanchez-Hernandez, D., Ahmed, M., Anderson, G.H, Marinangeli, C.P.F., House, J.D. & Anderson, G. H. (2021). An examination of contributions of animal and plant based dietary patterns on the nutrient quality of diets of adult Canadians. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 46, 877-886. dx.doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2020-1039
Fahmi, R., Ryland, D., Sopiwnyk, E., & Aliani, M. (2019). Sensory and Physical Characteristics of Pan Bread Fortified with Thermally Treated Split Yellow Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Flour. Journal of Food Science, 84(12), 3735–3745. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14908
Frohlich, P., Young, G., Borsuk, Y., Sigvaldson, M., Bourré, L., & Sopiwnyk, E. (2021). Influence of premilling thermal treatments of yellow peas, navy beans, and fava beans on the flavor and end‐product quality of tortillas and pitas. Cereal Chemistry, 98(3), 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10424
Fujiwara, N., Hall, C., & Jenkins, A. L. (2017). Development of Low Glycemic Index (GI) Foods by Incorporating Pulse Ingredients into Cereal-Based Products: Use of In Vitro Screening and In Vivo Methodologies. Cereal Chemistry Journal, 94(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-04-16-0119-FI
Gallego, C., Belorio, M., Guerra‐Oliveira, P., & Gómez, M. (2022). Effects of adding chickpea and chestnut flours to layer cakes. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 57(8), 4840–4846. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15719
Gomes, D. de S., Rosa, L. S., Cordoba, L. do P., Fiorda-Mello, F., Spier, M. R., & Waszczynskyj, N. (2022). Development of muffins with green pea flour and their physical and sensory evaluation and essential amino acid content. Ciência Rural, 52(7). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20200693
Gómez, M., Doyagüe, M. J., & de la Hera, E. (2012). Addition of pin-milled pea flour and air-classified fractions in layer and sponge cakes. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 46(1), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.10.014
Hajas, L., Sipos, L., Csobod, É. C., Bálint, M. V., Juhász, R., & Benedek, C. (2022). Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Flour Varieties as Promising New Ingredients for Gluten-Free Cookies. Foods, 11(14), 2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142028
Han, J. (Jay), Janz, J. A. M., & Gerlat, M. (2010). Development of gluten-free cracker snacks using pulse flours and fractions. Food Research International, 43(2), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.015
Jeong, D., Hong, J. S., Liu, Q., Choi, H., & Chung, H. (2021). The effects of different levels of heat‐treated legume flour on nutritional, physical, textural, and sensory properties of gluten‐free muffins. Cereal Chemistry, 98(2), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10379
Kamel, M. A.-A., ALy, M. H. H., & Abd-El-Khalek Mokhtar. (2020). Preparation of Gluten-Free Corn Crackers Supplemented with Some Legume Flours. Journal of Advanced Research in Food Science and Nutrition, 03(01), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.24321/2582.3892.202006
Kohajdová, Z., Karovičová, J., & Magala, M. (2013). Effect of lentil and bean flours on rheological and baking properties of wheat dough. Chemical Papers, 67(4). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-012-0295-3
Kotsiou, K., Sacharidis, D.-D., Matsakidou, A., Biliaderis, C. G., & Lazaridou, A. (2021). Impact of Roasted Yellow Split Pea Flour on Dough Rheology and Quality of Fortified Wheat Breads. Foods, 10(8), 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081832
Krause, S., Keller, S., Hashemi, A., Descharles, N., Bonazzi, C., & Rega, B. (2022). From flours to cakes: Reactivity potential of pulse ingredients to generate volatile compounds impacting the quality of processed foods. Food Chemistry, 371, 131379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131379
Mansoor, R., Ali, T.M. & Hasnain, A. (2021). Effects of barley flour substitution on glycemic index, compositional, rheological, textural and sensory characteristics of chickpea flour based flat bread. Legume Science, 3:e89. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.89
Marinangeli, C.P.F. (2020). Complementing cereal grains with pulse grains to enhance the nutrition and environmental sustainability profiles of manufactured foods in Canada and the United States. Cereal Foods World, 65(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-65-6-0063
Millar, K. A., Barry-Ryan, C., Burke, R., Hussey, K., McCarthy, S., & Gallagher, E. (2017). Effect of pulse flours on the physiochemical characteristics and sensory acceptance of baked crackers. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 52(5), 1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13388
Millar, K. A., Barry-Ryan, C., Burke, R., McCarthy, S., & Gallagher, E. (2019). Dough properties and baking characteristics of white bread, as affected by addition of raw, germinated and toasted pea flour. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 56, 102189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102189
Mohammed, I., Ahmed, A. R., & Senge, B. (2014). Effects of chickpea flour on wheat pasting properties and bread making quality. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(9), 1902–1910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0733-9
Muldabekova, B. Zh., Umirzakova, G. A., Assangaliyeva, Z. R., Maliktayeva, P. M., Zheldybayeva, A. A., & Yakiyayeva, M. A. (2022). Nutritional Evaluation of Buns Developed from Chickpea-Mung Bean Composite Flour and Sugar Beet Powder. International Journal of Food Science, 2022, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6009998
Ouazib, M., Garzon, R., Zaidi, F., & Rosell, C. M. (2016). Germinated, toasted and cooked chickpea as ingredients for breadmaking. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(6), 2664–2672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2238-4
Ozkahraman, B. C., Sumnu, G., & Sahin, S. (2016). Effect of different flours on quality of legume cakes to be baked in microwave-infrared combination oven and conventional oven. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(3), 1567–1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2101-z
Ozulku, G., & Arıcı, M. (2017). Characterization of the rheological and technological properties of the frozen sourdough bread with chickpea flour addition. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 11(3), 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9528-z
Perri, G., Rizzello, C. G., Ampollini, M., Celano, G., Coda, R., Gobbetti, M., de Angelis, M., & Calasso, M. (2021). Bioprocessing of Barley and Lentil Grains to Obtain In Situ Synthesis of Exopolysaccharides and Composite Wheat Bread with Improved Texture and Health Properties. Foods, 10(7), 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071489
Pleming, D., Farahnaky, A., & Majzoobi, M. (2021). Effects of bread making methods, lupin variety and gluten powder on the quality of bread enriched with high percentage of lupin flour. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 56(12), 6707–6718. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15323
Plustea, L., Negrea, M., Cocan, I., Radulov, I., Tulcan, C., Berbecea, A., Popescu, I., Obistioiu, D., Hotea, I., Suster, G., Boeriu, A. E., & Alexa, E. (2022). Lupin (Lupinus spp.)-Fortified Bread: A Sustainable, Nutritionally, Functionally, and Technologically Valuable Solution for Bakery. Foods, 11(14), 2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142067
Qayyum, A., Munir, M., Raza, S., Gillani, M., Kanwal, S., Rashid, N., Mumtaz, A., Safdar, N., & Gillani, Z. (2017). Rheological and Qualitative Assessment of Wheat-Pea Composite Flour and its Utilization in Biscuits. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2017.30.3.258.265
Rababah, T. M., Al-Mahasneh, M. A., & Ereifej, K. I. (2006). Effect of Chickpea, Broad Bean, or Isolated Soy Protein Additions on the Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Biscuits. Journal of Food Science, 71(6), S438–S442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00077.x
Renzetti, S., Heetesonne, I., Ngadze, R. T., & Linnemann, A. R. (2022). Dry Heating of Cowpea Flour below Biopolymer Melting Temperatures Improves the Physical Properties of Bread Made from Climate-Resilient Crops. Foods, 11(11), 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11111554
Rizzello, C. G., Calasso, M., Campanella, D., de Angelis, M., & Gobbetti, M. (2014). Use of sourdough fermentation and mixture of wheat, chickpea, lentil and bean flours for enhancing the nutritional, texture and sensory characteristics of white bread. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 180, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.04.005
Santos, F. G., Fratelli, C., Muniz, D. G., & Capriles, V. D. (2018). Mixture Design Applied to the Development of Chickpea-Based Gluten-Free Bread with Attractive Technological, Sensory, and Nutritional Quality. Journal of Food Science, 83(1), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14009
Schmelter, L., Rohm, H., & Struck, S. (2021). Gluten-free bakery products: Cookies made from different Vicia faba bean varieties. Future Foods, 4, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100038
Sibian, M. S., & Riar, C. S. (2020). Formulation and characterization of cookies prepared from the composite flour of germinated kidney bean, chickpea, and wheat. Legume Science, leg3.42. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.42
Sozer, N., Melama, L., Silbir, S., Rizzello, C. G., Flander, L., & Poutanen, K. (2019). Lactic Acid Fermentation as a Pre-Treatment Process for Faba Bean Flour and Its Effect on Textural, Structural and Nutritional Properties of Protein-Enriched Gluten-Free Faba Bean Breads. Foods, 8(10), 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100431
Thongram, S., Tanwar, B., Chauhan, A., & Kumar, V. (2016). Physicochemical and organoleptic properties of cookies incorporated with legume flours. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1172389
Tufan, B., Sahin, S., & Sumnu, G. (2020). Utilization of legume flours in wafer sheets. Legume Science, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.12
Wesley, S. D., André, B. H. M., & Clerici, M. T. P. S. (2021). Gluten-free rice & bean biscuit: characterization of a new food product. Heliyon, 7(1), e05956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05956
Xing, Q., Kyriakopoulou, K., Zhang, L., Boom, R. M., & Schutyser, M. A. I. (2021). Protein fortification of wheat bread using dry fractionated chickpea protein-enriched fraction or its sourdough. LWT, 142, 110931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110931
Yadav, R. B., Yadav, B. S., & Dhull, N. (2012). Effect of incorporation of plantain and chickpea flours on the quality characteristics of biscuits. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0271-x
Young, G., Bourré, L., Frohlich, P., Borsuk, Y., Sarkar, A., Sopiwnyk, E., Jones, S., Dyck, A., & Malcolmson, L. (2020). Effect of roasting as a premilling treatment on the functional and bread baking properties of whole yellow pea flour. Cereal Chemistry, 97(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10233
Zhang, Y., Hu, R., Tilley, M., Siliveru, K., & Li, Y. (2021). Effect of Pulse Type and Substitution Level on Dough Rheology and Bread Quality of Whole Wheat-Based Composite Flours. Processes, 9(9), 1687. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9091687
Zucco, F., Borsuk, Y., & Arntfield, S. D. (2011). Physical and nutritional evaluation of wheat cookies supplemented with pulse flours of different particle sizes. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 44(10), 2070–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.06.007